Identify the following sources as first hand accounts or second hand accounts

Answer: I believe the answer is c.

Explanation:

Answer:

Correct answer is A new era of unification and peace that led to nearly 200 years of increasing Japanese population, wealth, knowledge, and infrastructure .

Explanation:

Second option is correct because this was one of the most prosperous period of Japanese history, also known as Tokugawa period. It was a period of isolation, when Japan developed.

All other options are not correct, because Japanese weren't allowing influence from the outside.

Answer:

E.The term North-South division is used to refer to the social, economic and political division that exists between developed countries, also known as countries of the North or Global North, and the less developed countries of the "South" or Global South.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

Turmoil

Explanation:

Answer: King James I granted the Virginia Company a royal charter for the colonial pursuit in 1606. The Company had the power to appoint a Council of leaders in the colony, a Governor, and other officials. It also took the responsibility to continually provide settlers, supplies, and ships for the venture.

Explanation:

Answer:

All most nothing can be explained with one cause, the fall of the Roman Empire was due to many factors.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer: Predestination

Explanation: This Christian doctrine speaks that, although it is true that God knows everything that is going to happen, he lets it happen since there is something that human beings have and that is free will. God, if he wants, can destroy the world since he knows when the end of things will be, but he lets things happen as faith in humanity that they can change.

Answer:

Following the ratification of article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles at the conclusion of World War I, the Central Powers were compelled to give war reparations to the Allied Powers. Each of the defeated powers were required to make payments in either cash or kind. Because of the financial situation in Austria, Hungary, and Turkey after the war, few to no reparations were paid and the requirements for reparations were cancelled. Bulgaria, having paid only a fraction of what was required, saw its reparation figure reduced and then cancelled. Historians have recognized the German requirement to pay reparations as the "chief battleground of the post-war era" and "the focus of the power struggle between France and Germany over whether the Versailles Treaty was to be enforced or revised".[1]

The Treaty of Versailles (signed in 1919) and the 1921 London Schedule of Payments required Germany to pay 132 billion gold marks (US$33 billion [all values are contemporary, unless otherwise stated]) in reparations to cover civilian damage caused during the war. This figure was divided into three categories of bonds: A, B, and C. Of these, Germany was required to pay towards 'A' and 'B' bonds totaling 50 billion marks (US$12.5 billion) unconditionally. The payment of the remaining 'C' bonds was interest free and contingent on the Weimar Republic's ability to pay, as was to be assessed by an Allied committee.

Due to the lack of reparation payments by Germany, France occupied the Ruhr in 1923 to enforce payments, causing an international crisis that resulted in the implementation of the Dawes Plan in 1924. This plan outlined a new payment method and raised international loans to help Germany to meet its reparation commitments. Despite this, by 1928 Germany called for a new payment plan, resulting in the Young Plan that established the German reparation requirements at 112 billion marks (US$26.3 billion) and created a schedule of payments that would see Germany complete payments by 1988. With the collapse of the German economy in 1931, reparations were suspended for a year and in 1932 during the Lausanne Conference they were cancelled altogether. Between 1919 and 1932, Germany paid less than 21 billion marks in reparations.

The German people saw reparations as a national humiliation; the German Government worked to undermine the validity of the Treaty of Versailles and the requirement to pay. British economist John Maynard Keynes called the treaty a Carthaginian peace that would economically destroy Germany. His arguments had a profound effect on historians, politicians, and the public at large. Despite Keynes' arguments and those by later historians supporting or reinforcing Keynes' views, the consensus of contemporary historians is that reparations were not as intolerable as the Germans or Keynes had suggested and were within Germany's capacity to pay had there been the political will to do so. Following the Second World War, West Germany took up payments. The 1953 London Agreement on German External Debts resulted in an agreement to pay 50 per cent of the remaining balance. The final payment was made on 3 October 2010, settling German loan debts in regard to reparations.

Background

German reaction

Evolution of reparations

Analysis

See also

Notes

References

Further reading

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

Answer:

because they thought war would unify the country.

Explanation:

Answer:

A. it taxed American goods exported to Europe or other foreign lands. Hope this helps!

Answer:

The correct answer is D. It taxed all foreign goods imported to the United States.

Explanation:

I just took the qc and the other answers are...

1. What conditions contributed to Congress’s vote to authorize a declaration of war in 1812? Select the two correct answers.

westward expansion of British Canada & U.S. sympathy for the French Revolution

2. What did Tecumseh want?

to revive Native American traditions

3. Before becoming president, James Madison served as which of the following?

Secretary of State

ur welcome :)

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:

childre

Explanation:

Answer:

james madison that is the answer

Answer:

James Madison

Explanation:

He contributed to the Constitution a lot. That is why he is called the father of it.

Answer:

The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.

Explanation:

History is the science that studies the past.

Answer:

The Conservative Response: Let the Economy Stabilize

Explanation:

Answer:

may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio and Horton v. California ruled that the police, in certain cases, can search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.

Terry v. Ohio was the case, of which the Supreme Court gave verdict on June 10, 1968, in which the Supreme Court ruled that police can search individuals or seize property without a warrant. In Terry v. Ohio, the case was when a local plice officer suspected Terry and his two accomplice were upto something, possibly robbing of a store, searched them and found them armed with pistols.

And, in Horton v. California case, Seargent LaRault got warrant to search on the property of Horton, who was suspected of robbery, and found criminal weapons used at the time of robbery. Because the warrant only permitted of searching and not seizure of property, the Supreme Court gave verdict that in such cases, police can seize the property without warrant.

So, the correct answer is that the Supreme Court gave verdict that police in some cases can have warrantless individual search and seizure of property.

Answer:

may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio and Horton v. California ruled that the police, in certain cases, can search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.

Terry v. Ohio was the case, of which the Supreme Court gave verdict on June 10, 1968, in which the Supreme Court ruled that police can search individuals or seize property without a warrant. In Terry v. Ohio, the case was when a local plice officer suspected Terry and his two accomplice were upto something, possibly robbing of a store, searched them and found them armed with pistols.

And, in Horton v. California case, Seargent LaRault got warrant to search on the property of Horton, who was suspected of robbery, and found criminal weapons used at the time of robbery. Because the warrant only permitted of searching and not seizure of property, the Supreme Court gave verdict that in such cases, police can seize the property without warrant.

So, the correct answer is that the Supreme Court gave verdict that police in some cases can have warrantless individual search and seizure of property.

Answer:

Prior to the Seven Years War, the Colonists in Maryland Were Faithful

Subjects of the King and Lived Under the Protection of the British Military

Explanation:

In 1754, Maryland was a colony of Great Britain. People living in Maryland were

considered to be English citizens and they were governed by British laws. The colony

was ruled by a Royal Governor that reported directly to the King. The colonists

depended upon British merchants to supply them with many important items in their

daily lives including tools, clothing, furniture and weapons.

These goods were sailed across the Atlantic Ocean in large

ships and delivered to ports such as Annapolis, Baltimore,

Oxford, Cambridge and Chester (now Chestertown). In

return, colonial merchants sailed raw materials such as corn,

grain, tobacco and lumber to England. Daily life in

Maryland in 1754 often centered around activities that took

place on the water. Since nearly all trade goods traveled by

boat, most of Maryland’s homes were located within easy

walking distance of a major river. Rivers also provided the

colonists with an important source of food. In the spring,

striped bass, shad and herring were netted by the thousands

as the fish made their annual migrations up the Bay’s rivers

and streams. The Bay’s abundant oyster bars also added a

valuable source of protein to the colonists’ diets.

One of the greatest benefits to being an English

colony was receiving protection from the British military.

This was critical because the colonists had no established

military of their own. As a result, they lived under the

constant threat of invasion by the French and the Spanish,

who were struggling with England for control of North America. Without British

protection, either one of these world powers could have easily overtaken the colonists

and their lands.

In 1755, tensions between England and France led to the beginning of a conflict

known as the Seven Years War. From 1755 to 1762, English and French forces battled

each other throughout the Ohio Valley and Canada for control over the eastern half of

North America. Eventually, the French were driven from their lands and forced to

abandon their North American empire. When the war ended in 1763 with a convincing

English victory, it also left the country with a very large debt. As a result, King George

III decided to raise money by taxing the thirteen colonies. Disagreements over how

these taxes were created and enforced would soon change the relationship between

England and its thirteen colonies forever.

France established colonies in much of eastern North America, on a number of Caribbean islands, and in South America. Most colonies were developed to export products such as fish, rice, sugar, and furs.

Like the Spanish, the French also wanted to convert the "pagan" (one who is not Christian, Muslim, or Jewish) Native Americans to Roman Catholicism, thus combining conquest with a Christian mission. Hence, the answer is:

Therefore, the answer is D

learn more about French invasion of the North America from here: https://brainly.com/question/310840

Answer:

D, They explored the St. Lawrence River and brought missionaries.

Explanation:

Edge 2022

Have a great day <3

By the time of Justinian, the Byzantine Empire's economy was far wealthier than the small states of the former Roman Empire in the West.

When Justinian became emperor of the Byzantine empire, the empire's economy was quite prosperous.

This meant that they were far more wealthy than the small states that had come out of the Roman Empire in the West after that empire had fallen to different tribes.

Find out more on the Byzantine Empire at https://brainly.com/question/1446842

#SPJ1

Answer: was still struggling to keep up with the trade of Western Europe

Explanation:

Answer:

New England's English settlers

Explanation:

Answer:

Metacom, also known as Pometacom, Metacomet, and by his adopted English name King Philip, was sachem to the Wampanoag people and the second son of the Sachem Massasolt. Metacom became Sachem In 1662 when his brother Wamsutta died shortly after the death of their father.

Answer: Freedom, generally, is having the ability to act or change without constraint.

Explanation: A person has the freedom to do things that will not, in theory, or in practice, be prevented by other forces.

Hope this helps!! Brainlist Plz?!

Answer:

option 2

Explanation:

please Mark me brainliest

Answer:

C. Prohibition

Explanation:

Answer:

We find that these truths are self-explanitory. all men and women are created the same, they have been trusted by their religious god to be faithful.

Explanation: