if 50.0 g of 10.0 °c water is added to 40.0 g of at 68.0 ºc, what was the final temperature of the mix, assuming no heat is lost?

The wavelength of the light in the glass is 621 nm. The wavelength of a wave is inversely related to its frequency.

What is wavelength?

Wavelength refers to the distance between two consecutive points of a wave that are in phase with each other. It is a fundamental concept in physics and describes the spatial extent of one complete cycle of a wave.

In other words, wavelength measures the length of a wave from one peak (crest) to the next or from one trough to the next. It is typically denoted by the Greek letter lambda (λ).

To solve this problem, we can use the relationship between the speed of light, wavelength, and time. The speed of light in a vacuum (c) is approximately 3.00 × 10⁸ m/s.

First, let's calculate the speed of light in air. We know that the time it takes for the light to travel from the laser to the photocell in air is 17.5 ns (nanoseconds). Using the formula speed = distance/time, we can find the distance traveled by the light in air:

distance in air = speed in air × time = (3.00 × 10⁸ m/s) × (17.5 × 10⁻⁹ s) = 5.25 m

Next, let's calculate the speed of light in the glass. We know that the time it takes for the light to travel from the laser to the photocell through the glass is 21.5 ns. Using the same formula as above, we can find the distance traveled by the light in the glass:

distance in glass = speed in glass × time = (unknown) × (21.5 × 10⁻⁹ s)

Since the light travels along the normal to the parallel faces of the slab, the distance traveled in the glass is equal to the thickness of the glass slab, which is 0.800 m. Therefore, we can set up the equation:

distance in glass = 0.800 m

By equating the distances in air and in the glass, we can solve for the unknown speed in glass:

5.25 m = speed in glass × (21.5 × 10⁻⁹ s)

Finally, we can calculate the wavelength of the light in the glass using the speed in glass:

wavelength in glass = speed in glass × time = (speed in glass) × (17.5 × 10⁻⁹ s)

Substituting the value of the speed in glass we found earlier, we get: wavelength in glass = (5.25 m) / (21.5 × 10⁻⁹ s) = 0.24418604651 m

Converting this wavelength to nanometers (nm) and rounding to two significant figures, we find the wavelength of the light in the glass to be approximately 621 nm.

To know more about wavelength, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/6916860#

#SPJ4

The combination of frequencies that produce the lowest beat frequency is 10 Hz and 15 Hz. The correct option is C.

To determine the beat frequency, we subtract one frequency from the other and take the absolute value. The beat frequency is the difference between the frequencies involved in the interference pattern created by two sound waves.

Let's analyze each option:

A. 500 Hz and 501 Hz: The beat frequency would be 501 Hz - 500 Hz = 1 Hz.

B. 10 Hz and 20 Hz: The beat frequency would be 20 Hz - 10 Hz = 10 Hz.

C. 10 Hz and 15 Hz: The beat frequency would be 15 Hz - 10 Hz = 5 Hz.

D. 500 Hz and 600 Hz: The beat frequency would be 600 Hz - 500 Hz = 100 Hz.

Therefore, option C (10 Hz and 15 Hz) produces the lowest beat frequency of 5 Hz compared to the other options.

To learn more about Frequency click:

brainly.com/question/1292129

#SPJ1  

To find the angle made by the force on the electron due to the two protons, we can use trigonometry.

First, we need to find the distances between the electron and each proton. Let's denote the position of the electron as E, the first proton as P1, and the second proton as P2.

The distance between E and P1 is given by:

d1 = sqrt((x1 - xE)^2 + (y1 - yE)^2)

where (x1, y1) are the coordinates of P1 and (xE, yE) are the coordinates of the electron.

Similarly, the distance between E and P2 is given by:

d2 = sqrt((x2 - xE)^2 + (y2 - yE)^2)

where (x2, y2) are the coordinates of P2.

Using the given coordinates, we have:

d1 = sqrt((0 - 1.15)^2 + (1.75 - 1.75)^2) = 1.15 nm

d2 = sqrt((1.15 - 1.15)^2 + (0 - 1.75)^2) = 1.75 nm

Next, we can calculate the angle between the force on the electron and the +x axis using the law of cosines. Let's denote this angle as θ.

cos(θ) = (d1^2 + d2^2 - d3^2) / (2 * d1 * d2)

where d3 is the distance between P1 and P2, which is given by:

d3 = sqrt((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2) = sqrt((1.15 - 0)^2 + (0 - 1.75)^2) = sqrt(3.3^2 + 1.75^2) = sqrt(14.245) = 3.77 nm

Substituting the values, we have:

cos(θ) = (1.15^2 + 1.75^2 - 3.77^2) / (2 * 1.15 * 1.75)

cos(θ) = (-2.3575) / (4.015)

Taking the inverse cosine, we find:

θ = cos^(-1)(-0.5867) ≈ 123.3°

However, this angle is measured with respect to the +x axis, so we need to subtract it from 180° to get the angle made by the force on the electron.

Angle = 180° - 123.3° ≈ 56.7°

Therefore, the angle made by the force on the electron due to the two protons, measured with respect to the +x axis, is approximately 56.7°.

Learn more about force from

https://brainly.com/question/12785175

#SPJ11

At the highest point of the track, the kinetic energy is zero. As the skater descends the track, the kinetic energy increases.

To match the kinetic energy to the position of a skater on a track, we need to understand how kinetic energy changes with respect to the skater's position. Kinetic energy is given by the equation:

KE = (1/2) * m * v^2

where KE is the kinetic energy, m is the mass of the skater, and v is the velocity of the skater.

At the highest point of the track: At the highest point of the track, the skater's potential energy is maximized while the kinetic energy is minimized. The skater is momentarily at rest at the highest point of the track, so the kinetic energy is zero.

Descending the track: As the skater descends the track, the potential energy decreases and is converted into kinetic energy. The skater's speed increases, resulting in an increase in kinetic energy. The kinetic energy is higher than at the highest point of the track but still less than the potential energy.

At the bottom of the track: At the bottom of the track, the skater's potential energy is minimized and converted entirely into kinetic energy. The skater's speed is at its maximum, resulting in the highest kinetic energy. The kinetic energy at the bottom of the track is the maximum.

Ascending the track: As the skater ascends the track, the potential energy increases while the kinetic energy decreases. The skater's speed decreases, resulting in a decrease in kinetic energy. The kinetic energy is lower than at the bottom of the track but still greater than at the highest point.

For more such questions on highest point visit;

https://brainly.com/question/30285676

#SPJ8

The theoretical maximum speedup of a pipeline can be calculated using the formula:

Maximum Speedup = Number of Stages

In this case, the pipeline has 7 stages, so the theoretical maximum speedup would be 7.

A pipeline hazard refers to a situation in a pipeline where the normal flow of instructions is interrupted or delayed, leading to a decrease in performance or efficiency. Pipeline hazards can occur due to dependencies between instructions or conflicts in resource usage. There are three types of pipeline hazards:

Structural hazards: These occur when multiple instructions require the same hardware resource at the same time. For example, if two instructions need to access the same register or memory location simultaneously.

Data hazards: These occur when an instruction depends on the result of a previous instruction that has not yet completed. Data hazards can be further classified into three types: read-after-write (RAW), write-after-read (WAR), and write-after-write (WAW) hazards.

Control hazards: These occur due to changes in the program flow, such as branches or jumps. Control hazards can result in the pipeline incorrectly predicting the next instruction, leading to wasted cycles.

To mitigate pipeline hazards, techniques like forwarding, branch prediction, and instruction scheduling can be employed. These techniques aim to minimize stalls and ensure smooth execution of instructions in the pipeline, thereby improving overall performance.

Learn more about theoretical here

https://brainly.com/question/11555274

#SPJ11

To calculate the pressure required to reduce the edge length of a solid copper cube from 85.5 cm to 85 cm, we can use the concept of bulk modulus.

K = -V(ΔP/ΔV)

ΔV = (ΔL)^3

The bulk modulus (K) relates the change in pressure (ΔP) to the fractional change in volume (ΔV/V) of a material:

K = -V(ΔP/ΔV)

Here, we are given the change in length (ΔL) as 85.5 cm - 85 cm = 0.5 cm. The original length (L) is 85.5 cm. Since the copper cube is a cube, the change in volume (ΔV) is equal to the change in length cubed:

ΔV = (ΔL)^3

Substituting these values into the equation, we get:

K = -V(ΔP/ΔV)

K = -V(ΔP/(ΔL)^3)

K = -(L^3)(ΔP/(ΔL)^3)

K = -(85.5 cm)^3(ΔP/(0.5 cm)^3)

K = -85.5^3(ΔP/0.125)

Now, since we know the bulk modulus of copper, we can substitute its value into the equation:

140 GPa = -85.5^3(ΔP/0.125)

Solving for ΔP, we can rearrange the equation:

ΔP = (140 GPa * 0.125)/(-85.5^3)

Evaluating this expression, we find:

ΔP ≈ -1.609 GPa

Therefore, approximately 1.609 GPa of pressure must be applied to reduce the edge length of the copper cube from 85.5 cm to 85 cm.

Learn more about modulus here

https://brainly.com/question/12910262

#SPJ11

Bohr's theory postulated that there was a relationship between electron orbits and light emission. According to his theory, the energy difference between two electron orbits would equal the energy of an emitted photon.

This means that when an electron jumps from a higher orbit to a lower one, it releases energy in the form of a photon. Furthermore, Bohr proposed that the frequency of electrons circling a nucleus was equal to the frequency of the emitted light. In other words, the energy of the photon is related to the frequency of the light.

Finally, Bohr suggested that the energy of an electron orbit was equal to the energy of the emitted light. This means that the energy of the photon corresponds to the difference in energy between the two electron orbits.

Overall, Bohr's theory provided a framework for understanding the relationship between electron orbits and light emission, and paved the way for further advances in the field of atomic physics.

To know more about Bohr's theory, refer

https://brainly.com/question/11891941

#SPJ11

To determine the speed of the tennis player's racket immediately after the impact with the tennis ball, we can apply the law of conservation of momentum. The total momentum before the impact should be equal to the total momentum after the impact.

The initial momentum of the racket is given by the product of its mass and velocity, which is (1000 gg) * (10.0 m/s) = 10,000 kg∙m/s.

The initial momentum of the tennis ball is (60 gg) * (16.0 m/s) = 960 kg∙m/s.

The final momentum of the tennis ball after the rebound is (60 gg) *(42.0 m/s) = 2,520 kg∙m/s.

Since momentum is conserved, the final momentum of the racket and the ball together must also be 2,520 kg∙m/s.

Let's denote the final velocity of the racket as 'v_racket'. We can write the equation as follows:

10,000 kg∙m/s + 960 kg∙m/s = (1000 gg + 60 gg) * v_racket

10,960 kg∙m/s = 1060 gg * v_racket

Simplifying the equation, we find:

v_racket = (10,960 kg∙m/s) / (1060 gg) ≈ 10.34 m/s

Therefore, the speed of the tennis player's racket immediately after the impact is approximately 10.34 m/s.

Learn more about momentum at:

brainly.com/question/30487676

#SPJ11

Rοtatiοn is the lateral (up, dοwn, right, left, in, οut) mοvement οf every pοint in an οbject by the same amοunt and in the same directiοn , is false

During rοtatiοn, all pοints in the οbject mοve alοng circular paths arοund the axis οf rοtatiοn. Each pοint in the οbject fοllοws a specific angular displacement, but there is nο lateral οr translatiοnal mοvement invοlved.

In cοntrast, lateral mοvements (up, dοwn, right, left, in, οut) cοrrespοnd tο translatiοns οr displacements οf an οbject in different directiοns withοut any rοtatiοnal mοvement.

Rοtatiοn is nοt the lateral (up, dοwn, right, left, in, οut) mοvement οf every pοint in an οbject. Instead, rοtatiοn refers tο the circular οr angular mοvement οf an οbject arοund a central pοint οr axis. It invοlves the turning οr spinning οf an οbject withοut any lateral displacement οf its pοints. Therefοre, it is False.

To learn more about rotation, visit.

https://brainly.com/question/1571997

#SPJ4

To keep the meter stick balanced option b) 70 cm  would hang a third mass of 0.60'

One οf a bοdy's fundamental characteristics is mass. Befοre the discοvery οf the atοm and particle physics, it was widely cοnsidered tο be cοnnected tο the amοunt οf matter in a physical bοdy. Theοretically having the same quantity οf substance, it was discοvered that distinct atοms and elementary particles have varying masses.

Several cοnceptiοns οf mass exist in cοntempοrary physics, all οf which are physically equivalent while cοnceptually differing. The resistance οf the bοdy tο acceleratiοn (change οf velοcity) when a net fοrce is applied is knοwn as inertia, and inertia may be measured experimentally using mass. The magnitude οf an οbject's gravitatiοnal pull οn οther bοdies is alsο gοverned by its mass.

To keep the meter stick balanced, the torques on both sides of the pivot point must be equal. The torque is calculated as the product of the weight (mg) and the perpendicular distance from the pivot point.

The correct option is b) 70 cm

0.5 kg at 20 cm

0.3 kg at 60 cm

x = Distance of the third 0.6 kg mass

Meter stick hanging at 50 cm

Torque about the support point is given by (torque is conserved)

The position of the third mass of 0.6 kg is at 20+50 = 70 cm

To learn more about mass , visit.

https://brainly.com/question/11954533

#SPJ4

The correct answer to this question is a. Zero. The reason for this is that a neutral conductor, by definition, has no net charge or current flowing through it.

Therefore, there are no charged particles within the conductor that could be affected by a magnetic field. Even if there were charged particles present, the magnetic force on a charged particle is proportional to the velocity of the particle, and in the absence of any external forces, the velocity of a charged particle inside a conductor would be zero.

So, in either case, the magnetic force on a particle inside a neutral conductor is zero. It is important to note, however, that if the conductor were not neutral and had a current flowing through it, then there would be a magnetic force on the charged particles within the conductor.

To know more about magnetic field visit-

brainly.com/question/19542022

#SPJ11

Among the given options, Entropy can be interpreted as a measure of randomness in a system. The correct answer is option D.

Entropy is a thermodynamic property that quantifies the disorder or randomness in a system. It is related to the number of ways the particles in a system can be arranged, and a higher entropy value indicates a more random distribution of particles.

Temperature (A) is a measure of the average kinetic energy of particles, Free energy (B) is the energy available to do useful work, and Enthalpy (C) is the total energy of a system. While these properties are important in understanding a system's behavior, it is Entropy (D) that specifically measures the randomness of a system.

Learn more about Entropy here:

https://brainly.com/question/20166134

#SPJ11

The amplitude of the induced EMF in a generator with a square coil of 300 turns, side length 45 cm, magnetic field magnitude 0.80 T, and frequency 60.0 Hz is 30.24 V.


1. Calculate the area of the square coil: A = side^2 = (0.45 m)^2 = 0.2025 m^2
2. Calculate the angular frequency: ω = 2πf = 2π(60 Hz) = 376.99 rad/s
3. Use Faraday's Law to calculate the induced EMF amplitude: |EMF| = NABωsin(ωt)
4. Since we're looking for the amplitude, we only need the maximum value, which occurs when sin(ωt) = 1.
5. Thus, |EMF|max = NABω = (300 turns)(0.2025 m^2)(0.80 T)(376.99 rad/s) = 30.24 V

The amplitude of the induced EMF is 30.24 volts.

Learn more about Faraday's Law here:

https://brainly.com/question/31783788

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the magnetic force on the 141 cm side of the loop is 0, while the magnitude of the magnetic force on the 41.3 cm side is approximately 0.106 Newtons.

To calculate the magnitude of the magnetic force on the current loop, we can use the formula for the magnetic force on a current-carrying wire in a magnetic field:

F = [tex]I*L*B Sin[/tex]Ф

where:

F is the magnitude of the magnetic force

I is the current in the wire

L is the length of the wire segment

B is the magnitude of the magnetic field

theta is the angle between the wire and the magnetic field

(a) For the 141 cm side:

Using the given values:

I = 4.08 A

L = 141 cm

L = 1.41 m

B = 61.6 mT

B= 0.0616 T

Ф= 0 degrees (since the magnetic field is parallel to the current in the 141 cm side)

Plugging in the values into the formula:

F = 4.08 A * 1.41 m * 0.0616 T * sin(0°)

F = 0

Therefore, the magnitude of the magnetic force on the 141 cm side of the loop is 0.

(b) For the 41.3 cm side:

Using the given values:

I = 4.08 A

L = 41.3 cm = 0.413 m

B = 61.6 mT = 0.0616 T

Ф = 90 degrees (since the magnetic field is perpendicular to the current in the 41.3 cm side)

Plugging in the values into the formula:

F = 4.08 A * 0.413 m * 0.0616 T * sin(90°

F = 0.106 N

Therefore, the magnitude of the magnetic force on the 41.3 cm side of the loop is approximately 0.106 Newtons.

In conclusion, the magnitude of the magnetic force on the 141 cm side of the loop is 0, while the magnitude of the magnetic force on the 41.3 cm side is approximately 0.106 Newtons.

To know more about current visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1100341

#SPJ11

The value of g on the unfamiliar planet is approximately 2.859 m/s² .the value of acceleration due to gravity (g) on the unfamiliar planet, we can use the equation for the period of a simple pendulum:

T = 2π√(L/g),

where T is the period of the pendulum, L is the length of the pendulum, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.

In this case, we know that the period of the pendulum is the time it takes for one complete swing, which is given as 130 seconds. The length of the pendulum is 45.0 cm (or 0.45 meters). The number of complete swings, 95.0, is not needed for this calculation.

Let's substitute the known values into the equation:

130 = 2π√(0.45/g).

To find the value of g, we need to isolate it on one side of the equation. We can start by dividing both sides by 2π:

130/(2π) = √(0.45/g).

Next, square both sides of the equation to eliminate the square root:

(130/(2π))^2 = 0.45/g.

Now, we can rearrange the equation to solve for g:

g = 0.45/((130/(2π))^2).

Evaluating this expression will give us the value of g on the unfamiliar planet:

g ≈ 2.859 m/s².

Learn more about pendulum visit:

https://brainly.com/question/26449711

#SPJ11

The magnitude of displacement can be determined by finding the shortest distance between the initial and final positions. In this case, the book ends up at the initial position, which means the displacement is zero.

Since the book returns to its initial position, the overall displacement is zero, indicating that the book has covered a closed path or a complete loop around the table. Although the book has traveled a distance equal to the perimeter of the table (6 meters in this case), the net displacement is zero since it ends up at the same point it started from.

Therefore, the magnitude of the displacement is zero.

Learn more about magnitude of the displacement  here:

https://brainly.com/question/28016627

#SPJ11

The rod's angular velocity when the beads reach the ends of the rod and when the beads fly off the rod are 11.12 rad/s and 18.46 rad/s respectively.

(a) The initial angular velocity of the rod is given as 12.0 rad/s. When the catches are released and the beads slide outward, the law of conservation of angular momentum states that the total angular momentum of the system remains constant.

The moment of inertia of the rod with the beads is given by:

I = (1/3) * m * L^2

where m is the mass of the rod and L is its length.

The moment of inertia of each bead is given by:

I_bead = m_bead * r^2

where m_bead is the mass of each bead and r is the distance of each bead from the axis of rotation.

Initially, the beads are located 18 cm from the axis of rotation. As they slide outward, their distance from the axis increases.

The total initial angular momentum is given by:

L_initial = I * ω_initial

where ω_initial is the initial angular velocity.

The final angular momentum is given by:

L_final = (I + 2 * I_bead) * ω_final

where ω_final is the final angular velocity.

Since angular momentum is conserved, L_initial = L_final.

Substituting the given values:

I = (1/3) * 0.190 kg * (1.00 m)^2

m_bead = 0.022 kg

r_initial = 0.18 m

L_initial = L_final

I * ω_initial = (I + 2 * I_bead) * ω_final

Solving for ω_final:

ω_final = (I * ω_initial) / (I + 2 * I_bead)

Substituting the values:

ω_final = (0.333 J * 12.0 rad/s) / (0.333 J + 2 * (0.022 kg * (0.18 m)^2))

Simplifying the expression:

ω_final ≈ 11.12 rad/s

Therefore, the rod's angular velocity when the beads reach the ends of the rod is approximately 11.12 rad/s in the same direction as the initial rotation.

(b) If the beads fly off the rod, it means they have reached the ends of the rod and are no longer attached. In this case, the moment of inertia of the system changes.

The final moment of inertia is given by:

I_final = (1/3) * m * L^2 + 2 * I_bead

Using the given values:

I_final = (1/3) * 0.190 kg * (1.00 m)^2 + 2 * (0.022 kg * (0.18 m)^2)

I_final ≈ 0.215 J

To find the final angular velocity, we use the same formula as before:

ω_final = (I * ω_initial) / (I_final)

ω_final = (0.333 J * 12.0 rad/s) / 0.215 J

ω_final ≈ 18.46 rad/s

Therefore, the rod's angular velocity when the beads fly off the rod is approximately 18.46 rad/s in the same direction as the initial rotation.

(a) The rod's angular velocity when the beads reach the ends of the rod is approximately 11.12 rad/s.

(b) The rod's angular velocity when the beads fly off the rod is approximately 18.46 rad/s.

To know more about angular, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13014974

#SPJ11

In the visible spectrum, blue has the shortest wavelength, so it is the color that will be closest to the zero-order fringe.

The first-order fringes (f₁) are located on the same side of the zero-order fringe (fo) as the slits. This is because the first-order fringes are caused by light waves that have been diffracted by the slits. The shorter the wavelength of light, the more it is diffracted, and the closer the first-order fringes will be to the zero-order fringe.

Therefore, the color that corresponds to the shortest wavelength is the one that is closest to the zero-order fringe.

In the visible spectrum, blue has the shortest wavelength, so it is the color that will be closest to the zero-order fringe.

Learn more about wavelength on

https://brainly.com/question/10728818

#SPJ1

The statement is incorrect. The integral of the probability density from one wall to the other is constant for a one-dimensional, infinite potential well.

In a one-dimensional, infinite potential well, the probability density of finding an electron is constant within the well and is zero outside the well. This means that the integral of the probability density from one wall to the other is constant and does not decrease.

The probability density can be found using the wave function of the electron, which is a solution to the Schrödinger equation for the infinite potential well. The wave function has standing wave patterns that correspond to different energy levels of the electron.

The probability density is the square of the absolute value of the wave function and represents the likelihood of finding the electron at a particular position. Therefore, the integral of the probability density from one wall to the other is a measure of the total probability of finding the electron within the well, which remains constant.

Learn more about wave function here:

https://brainly.com/question/29899150

#SPJ11

To find the minimum energy needed to change the speed of a vehicle, we can use the kinetic energy equation: Kinetic Energy (KE) = (1/2) * mass * velocity^2

Mass (m) = 1600 kg

Initial velocity (v1) = 15.0 m/s

Final velocity (v2) = 40.0 m/s

To calculate the minimum energy needed, we can find the difference in kinetic energy between the initial and final velocities:

ΔKE = KE2 - KE1

KE1 = (1/2) * m * v1^2

KE2 = (1/2) * m * v2^2

ΔKE = (1/2) * m * v2^2 - (1/2) * m * v1^2

Substituting the given values:

ΔKE = (1/2) * 1600 kg * (40.0 m/s)^2 - (1/2) * 1600 kg * (15.0 m/s)^2

ΔKE = 0.5 * 1600 kg * (1600 - 225) m^2/s^2

ΔKE = 0.5 * 1600 kg * 1375 m^2/s^2

ΔKE = 1,100,000 Joules

Therefore, the minimum energy needed to change the speed of the sport utility vehicle from 15.0 m/s to 40.0 m/s is 1,100,000 Joules.

Learn more about speed here

https://brainly.com/question/13943409

#SPJ11

The wavelength of the first light is 5 x 10⁻⁶.

The wavelength of the second light is 6.5 x 10⁻⁶.

The wavelength of the third light is 4 x 10⁻⁶.

Grating constant, d = 5 x 10⁻⁵m

An optical element having a periodic structure that divides light into several beams that move in different directions is known as a diffraction grating.

It is an alternate method of using a prism to view spectra. Typically, the divided light will have a maximum at an angle when light is incident on the grating.

The expression for the diffraction grating is given by,

nλ = d sinθ

1) sinθ = 10 x 10⁻²/1 = 10⁻¹

So, the wavelength of the light is,

λ = d sinθ

λ = 5 x 10⁻⁵ x 10⁻¹

λ = 5 x 10⁻⁶m

2) sinθ = 13 x 10⁻²/1 = 1.3 x 10⁻¹

So, the wavelength of the light is,

λ = d sinθ

λ = 5 x 10⁻⁵x 1.3 x 10⁻¹

λ = 6.5 x 10⁻⁶m

3) sinθ = 8 x 10⁻²/1 = 8 x 10⁻²

So, the wavelength of the light is,

λ = d sinθ

λ = 5 x 10⁻⁵x 8 x 10⁻²

λ = 4 x 10⁻⁶m

To learn more about diffraction grating, click:

https://brainly.com/question/30409878

#SPJ1

At a jet airliner altitude of 38,000 feet, the diameter of the laser beam would be approximately 37.34 meters.

Beam divergence refers to the spreading out of a laser beam as it travels away from its source. The angle of divergence (θ) can be approximated using the formula:

θ = λ / (π * D)

Where:

θ is the angle of divergence,

λ is the wavelength of the laser light,

D is the diameter of the circular aperture.

First, let's calculate the angle of divergence using the given values:

θ = 5.32 × 10⁻⁷ m / (π * 1.25 × 10⁻³ m)

θ ≈ 0.135 radians

Now, we can calculate the diameter of the laser beam at the jet airliner altitude by using the tangent of the angle of divergence and the altitude:

Beam diameter = 2 * altitude * tan(θ)

Beam diameter = 2 * (38,000 × 0.3048 m) * tan(0.135 radians)

Beam diameter ≈ 37.34 meters

Learn more about laser beam here:

https://brainly.com/question/31200718

#SPJ11

(a) To find the kinetic energy of the fastest ejected electrons, we need to use the equation:

KE = hf - W

where KE is the kinetic energy of the electron, h is Planck's constant (6.626 x 10^-34 J.s), f is the frequency of the light, and W is the work function of aluminum (4.2 eV converted to joules is 6.73 x 10^-19 J).

First, we need to find the frequency of the light using the formula:

c = fλ

where c is the speed of light (3 x 10^8 m/s) and λ is the wavelength of the light (200 nm or 2 x 10^-7 m).

Rearranging the formula, we get:

f = c/λ

f = (3 x 10^8)/(2 x 10^-7)

f = 1.5 x 10^15 Hz

Now we can plug in the values and solve for KE:

KE = hf - W

KE = (6.626 x 10^-34)(1.5 x 10^15) - 6.73 x 10^-19

KE = 9.92 x 10^-19 J

Converting this to electron volts (eV), we get:

KE = (9.92 x 10^-19)/(1.602 x 10^-19)

KE = 6.20 eV

Therefore, the kinetic energy of the fastest ejected electrons is 6.20 eV.

(b) To find the kinetic energy of the slowest ejected electrons, we can use the same equation as in part (a), but with a frequency equal to the cutoff frequency for aluminum. This is because electrons with less kinetic energy than the work function cannot be ejected.

(c) The stopping potential is the potential difference between the metal surface and the point where the kinetic energy of the fastest electrons is reduced to zero. We can find this using the equation:

eV_stop = KE_max

where e is the elementary charge (1.602 x 10^-19 C).

Plugging in the values from part (a), we get:

V_stop = KE_max/e

V_stop = 6.20/1.602

V_stop = 3.87 V

Therefore, the stopping potential is 3.87 V.

(d) The cutoff wavelength for aluminum can be found using the formula:

λ_cutoff = hc/W

where W is the work function of aluminum.

Plugging in the values, we get:

λ_cutoff = hc/W

λ_cutoff = [(6.626 x 10^-34)(3 x 10^8)]/6.73 x 10^-19

λ_cutoff = 2.92 x 10^-7 m

Converting this to nanometers, we get:

λ_cutoff = 292 nm

Therefore, the cutoff wavelength for aluminum is 292 nm.

Learn more about  wavelength from

https://brainly.com/question/10750459

#SPJ11

Answer: 4 plums

Explanation:

30 cals x 4 plums = 120cal energy

A 1.0 kg ball hits the floor with a velocity of 2.0 m/s and bounces back up with a velocity of 1.5 m/s, the ball's change in momentum is -3.5 kg m/s.

The ball's change in momentum can be calculated using the formula:
change in momentum = final momentum - initial momentum
The initial momentum of the ball can be found using the formula:
initial momentum = mass x velocity
So, the initial momentum of the ball is:
initial momentum = 1.0 kg x 2.0 m/s = 2.0 kg m/s
The final momentum of the ball can also be found using the same formula:
final momentum = mass x velocity
So, the final momentum of the ball is:
final momentum = 1.0 kg x (-1.5 m/s) = -1.5 kg m/s
(Note that the negative sign indicates that the ball is moving in the opposite direction after bouncing back up.)
Therefore, the ball's change in momentum is:
change in momentum = final momentum - initial momentum
change in momentum = (-1.5 kg m/s) - (2.0 kg m/s)
change in momentum = -3.5 kg m/s
To know more about change in momentum, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31707268

#SPJ11

An exoplanet with a mass 10 times that of Jupiter would have a size (radius) roughly 1.5 times larger than Jupiter.

The size of a planet depends on its mass and composition. For planets with a mass greater than Jupiter, their size is mainly determined by how much they compress under their own gravity. An exoplanet with a mass 10 times that of Jupiter would have a higher gravity, which would cause it to compress more than Jupiter, resulting in a larger size.

However, the exact size of such a planet would depend on its composition. If it had a similar composition to Jupiter, then its radius would be roughly 1.5 times larger than Jupiter. But if it had a different composition, such as a higher percentage of heavier elements, then its radius could be slightly larger or smaller than that.

Overall, the size of an exoplanet with a mass 10 times that of Jupiter would not be significantly larger or smaller than Jupiter, but rather in between the two sizes.

Learn more about exoplanet here:

https://brainly.com/question/30792669

#SPJ11

The tension in the string of a ball moving in a circular path is given by the equation:

Tension = (mass * velocity^2) / radius

F_c = (m * v^2) / r

12 N = (m * v^2) / r

v' = (2 * π * r) / (0.5 s)

v' = 4 * π * r

In this case, the mass of the ball and the radius of the circle remain constant. We can assume that the mass is canceled out when comparing the tensions.

Given that the ball completes a full circle in 1 second, the velocity is v = 2πr / t, where t is the time taken to complete the circle and r is the radius of the circle.

For the first case (1 second), we have v₁ = 2πr / 1.

For the second case (0.5 seconds), we have v₂ = 2πr / 0.5.

Since the radius is the same for both cases, we can compare the tensions using the ratio of velocities squared:

T₂ / T₁ = (v₂^2) / (v₁^2) = (2πr / 0.5)^2 / (2πr / 1)^2 = (4) / (1) = 4.

Therefore, the tension in the string when the ball completes the circle in half a second is 4 times the tension when it completes the circle in one second.

Given that the initial tension is 12, the tension for the half-second case is:

T₂ = T₁ * 4 = 12 * 4 = 48.

Therefore, the correct answer is (D) 48.

Learn more about tension here

https://brainly.com/question/24994188

#SPJ11

The power delivered to the screen by the electron beam depends on the current of the beam and the voltage applied to it.

The power delivered to the screen by the electron beam can be calculated using the formula P = IV, where P is the power, I is the current, and V is the voltage. The current of the beam is determined by the number of electrons in the beam and their speed, which is related to their kinetic energy.

The voltage applied to the beam is determined by the potential difference between the electron gun and the screen. Therefore, the power delivered to the screen is proportional to the product of the current and the voltage, which means that increasing either one will increase the power delivered to the screen.

However, there are also factors that can affect the efficiency of the electron beam, such as the focusing and deflection systems, which can reduce the amount of power delivered to the screen.

Learn more about electron beam here:

https://brainly.com/question/17026171

#SPJ11

The two particles that make up atoms and have about the same mass are the neutron and the proton.

The neutron has a mass slightly greater than the proton, but their masses are considered to be approximately equal.The two particles that have the same magnitude of electric charge are the proton and the electron. The proton has a positive charge, while the electron has an equal but opposite negative charge. The magnitude of their charges is the same, but the sign is different.

An electric current is the flow of electric charge in a conductor. It is the movement of electrons through a closed circuit. The units of electric current are the ampere (A), coulomb per second (C/s), or the milliampere (mA), which is equal to 0.001 A.

Therefore, the units of electric current are:

Ampere (A)

Coulomb per second (C/s)

Milliampere (mA) (equal to 0.001 A)

Learn more about neutron here

https://brainly.com/question/12602839

#SPJ11

(B) The change in kinetic energy of the car is greatest between positions 2 and 3.

The change in kinetic energy of an object is given by the formula:

ΔKE = (1/2) * m * (v₂² - v₁²),

where ΔKE is the change in kinetic energy, m is the mass of the object, v₁ is the initial velocity, and v₂ is the final velocity.

Since the car experiences a constant acceleration, its velocity increases uniformly over time. Looking at the given positions, we can observe that the car's velocity is increasing at a faster rate between positions 2 and 3 compared to the other positions.

Therefore, the change in kinetic energy is greatest between positions 2 and 3.

In positions 1 and 2, the car is still accelerating and gaining velocity, but the rate of increase is lower than between positions 2 and 3. Similarly, in positions 3 and 4, the car is still accelerating, but the rate of increase is lower compared to between positions 2 and 3.

Hence, the change in kinetic energy is greatest between positions (B) 2 and 3.

To know more about acceleration, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/2303856#

#SPJ4