As Laurie was arrested for some very minor traffic violations and her bail was set unreasonably high at $500,000 which she will not be able to pay which will have to make her remain in jail until her hearing, this scenario is not in compliance with the 8th Amendment.
What is the 8th Amendment?This refers to the federal legislation that limits the sanctions that may be imposed by the criminal justice system on those accused or convicted of criminal behaviour. The 8th Amendment contains three clauses which limit the amount of bail associated with a criminal infraction, the fines that may be imposed, and also the punishments that may be inflicted.
The legislation states that "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." Also, it is often mentioned in the context of the death penalty as the Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, but also mentions “excessive fines” and bail. This excessive fines clause surfaces (among other places in cases of civil and criminal forfeiture, for instance, when property is seized during a drug raid.
Therefore, as she was arrested for some very minor traffic violations and her bail was set unreasonably high at $500,000 which she will not be able to pay which will have to make her remain in jail until her hearing, this scenario is not in compliance with the 8th Amendment.
Read more about 8th Amendment
brainly.com/question/11287518
#SPJ1
Richard Nixon & Ronald Reagan are both credited with prison reform and leniency on crime
True or False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
this thesis find out Justice and the institution prison itself are not immutable fact of modern civilization
Victims and survivors of sexual assault are demanding justice and greater accountability for perpetrators of sexual assault, as exemplified by the #MeToo movement. Critics of #MeToo and this trend say that it has gone too far and ignores due process for the accused. How can victims of sexual assault receive adequate justice while satisfying a sense that such justice has been determined fairly?
Considering sexual harassment and sexual assault affect people on a daily basis, the "Me Too" movement, which focuses on the experiences of sexual violence survivors, has received a lot of support.
What is the "Me Too" movement?
The #MeToo hashtag is frequently used on social media to identify the Me Too movement, an initiative to bring about societal change. It was first established in 2006, but it only gained widespread attention in late 2017 after several well-known actresses spoke out about their encounters with sexual harassment in the movie business.Since then, the movement has served as a platform for women of various backgrounds who have been the victims of sexual harassment, which is most frequently, though not always, committed by a male coworker.Burke claims that by demonstrating the prevalence of sexual harassment and reassuring survivors that they aren't alone and are supported, the Me Too movement promotes empowerment through empathy.To know more about Victims of sexual assault visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10386606
#SPJ1
During a criminal trial process, whom does the jury inform after arriving at a verdict?
In a criminal trial process, the jury informs the
after arriving at a verdict.
Answer:
They inform the Defendant of the verdict.
my business is unstable how do i help stable it?
Answer: Money makes money. Invest your money more appropriately and find trust worthy employees to benefit your business.
Explanation:
Trump for pence 2020
the connection or relationship between civility and individualism
Answer: Individualism is a philosophy that views people first and foremost as unique individuals rather than as members of a group. It emphasizes the importance of independence, individuality, and autonomy. Foundation for Economic Education. Civility appeared over time from the word civis, which means citizen, that is, only men with property. It matured into civitas, meaning the rights and duties of citizenship, and then civilitas appeared, meaning the art and science of citizenship.
Explanation:
14. Philia runs a private school that is affiliated with the Catholic Church. She applies to a government program that provides loans to educational institutions in order to build a teaching library that emphasizes
Catholic teaching A public school that was denied a similar loan because the funds ran out sues Philia's school, arguing that using the loan for religious purposes violates the separation of church and state an
deprives public schools of needed resources to instead teach religion. What case would be important for both parties to review in this suit?
O
Fischer v. Saint Mary
New Jersey v. TLO
Brown v. Board of Education
Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Pauley
The case that would be important for both parties in the suit about the violation of the separation of church and state is Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Pauley.
What happened in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Pauley?Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Pauley was a landmark case in the United States Supreme Court that dealt with the state of Missouri refusing to give a religious school a grant that it gave to other non-religious schools.
The Supreme Court ruled that this action by the state of Missouri was a violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution which allowed for the freedom to exercise one's religion.
Philia's school that is affiliated with the Catholic Church therefore has the right to apply for the funding that it received and in the suit by the public school against them, both parties need to check this case of Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Pauley to make their next move.
Find out more on Catholic Schools at https://brainly.com/question/9705632
#SPJ1
What theory of government argues that power is held by a small group of people?
elitist theory
Marxist theory
democratic theory
pluralist theory
Answer: elite theory is the correct answer
Explanation:
congressmen are protected from arrest while in session except under what three conditions
Answer: GoodMorning: ) ✨ Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.
Hope this helps <3
Answer: congressmen are protected from arrest while in session except under what three conditions
Explanation:
all US citizens are subject to the laws of the people.
4. Explain the change that each of the following amendments made to the Constitution. (p. 13) . Fourteenth Amendment:
Nineteenth Amendment:
Twenty-Sixth Amendment:
No State shall make or execute any law limiting the privileges or immunities of United States citizens; amendments nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor shall any State change refuse equal protection of the laws to any person within its jurisdiction.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or limited on the basis of gender by the United States amendments or any State. Congress shall have the authority to enact appropriate legislation to implement this change article. The right to vote of citizens of the United States who are eighteen years of age.
To learn more about amendments, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ1
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
(A) The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
(B) They can show there was an error of law.
(C) The trial used an adversarial system.
(D)There was irrelevant evidence.
Answer: B they can show there was an error of law.
Explanation: After the jury has made their decision they have the opportunity to appeal if they believe there was an error of law shown.
Develop an argument that explains if the framers of the U.S. Constitution would approve of the current balance of power between of the national government relative to that of the states.
In your essay, you must:
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information
o At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
U.S. Constitution
Brutus 1
United States v. Lopez
Marbury v. Madison
o Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document from the list or from your study of the structure of American government.
• Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/thesis.
• Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal
Answer:
Develop an argument that explains if the framers of the U.S. Constitution would approve of the current balance of power between of the national government relative to that of the states.
In your essay, you must:
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information
o At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
U.S. Constitution
Brutus 1
United States v. Lopez
Marbury v. Madison
o Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document from the list or from your study of the structure of American government.
• Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/thesis.
• Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal
Explanation:
All of the following factors would cause a decline in the world’s growth EXCEPT: A. a decrease in child births B. an increase in the death rate C. environmental awareness D. government policies Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Answer:
the answer is C, environmental awareness doesn't affect
Explanation:
From the given choices the appropriate answer is C, environmental awareness, because, the others could all lead to a decline in population
A. Decrease in child birth has direct effect on decline
B. an increase in death also jas direct effect on decline of population
D. government policies also play great role in decrease of population, for example, If the government limits the capacity of each family's to give birth, the population will decrease
What is the principle of stare decisis and why is it important
Answer: Stare decisis means "to stand by things decided" in Latin. When a court faces a legal argument, if a previous court has ruled on the same or a closely related issue, then the court will make its decision in alignment with the last court's decision.
Explanation: it's straightforward to answer.
It takes
of alcohol to impair the eyes' ability to track.
A. a significant amount
B. a small amount
C. a moderate amount
Well, according to the internet, it takes only 4 drinks to become visionary impaired, so small amount ig
In a short Summary, What are the Articles of Confederation?
Answer: The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was the first written constitution of the United States. Written in 1777 and stemming from wartime urgency, its progress was slowed by fears of central authority and extensive land claims by states. It was not ratified until March 1, 1781
Explanation: hope this helps
...............................
Answer:
so true so true coud not agree more
Answer:
Are you speaking another language. Sorry I just know Spanish and English. I can't help you.
Explanation:
adrianna downey 35 :)
Answer: nice
Explanation:
Cool! That is neat to know
UvU
Describe how political differences between the major parties affect the nomination and
confirmation of justice
Answer:
Possible Changes to the Confirmation Process · by I Shapiro · Cited by 1 — Historically, the Senate has confirmed fewer than 60 percent of Supreme Court nominees under divided.
Explanation:
JROTC is not about joining the military. What is JROTC about?
The Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (JROTC) program prepares high school students for leadership roles while making them aware of their rights, responsibilities and privileges as American citizens. It instructs American youth in lessons of personal development, civic duty, leadership, and service.
Answer:
JROTC is mostly about self-discipline, it helps you understand and verify what's going on around you more clearly. JROTC helps you stay focused and helps you do more than what you would typically do like community service, or coming out to help cheer on your other cadets. JROTC members wants you to stay strong, wants you to keep yourself up tidy
Explanation: i really hope this helps you a lot
(Please Help)!!
Why does perception of crime matter?
Answer:
Abstract. Public perceptions of crime are valuable to policy makers because how the public perceives issues such as the seriousness of crime, fear of crime, the severity of penalties, and specific crime issues can shape the actions of legislators, who strive to respond to their constituents' concerns.Jul 5, 2022
Explain why have justice that represent the population of the country is important in selecting nominees
The reason why it is having a justice that represents the population of a country is important in selecting nominees is to ensure that current social conditions are taken into account when making laws.
Why should justices represent the population?The Supreme Court gets to rule on the constitutionality of the various laws that are passed across the country. Their justices should therefore be able to take into account, the views of the population when they make rulings on laws.
The only way to ensure that this happens is that a justice that represents the population of a country is selected as a nominee for the Supreme court.
Find out more on nominating justices at https://brainly.com/question/1193666
#SPJ1
Can you legally own a argentavis magnificens?
You cannot legally own a argentavis magnificens.
Can you legally own a argentavis magnificens?One of the largest flying birds ever to live was Argentavis magnificens. Argentavis is still regarded as the largest flying bird in history, but Pelagornis sandersi, which was reported in 2014 and is thought to have had wings about 20% longer than Argentavis', likely outgrew it in wingspan.
An extinct species known from three sites in the Epecuén and Andalhualá Formations in central and northwest Argentina is known as A. magnificens, also known as the Giant Teratorn.
In conclusion, you cannot legally own a argentavis magnificens. It's just like having a dinosaur which isn't possible.
Learn more about legal on:
https://brainly.com/question/6837890
#SPJ1
Describe the ruling in the 2010 case citizens united v federal election commission, what precedent did it overturn
The court decided by a vote of 5-4 that the free speech provision of the First Amendment makes it illegal for the government to limit the ability of companies, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other groups, to make independent expenditures for political campaigns.
This is further explained below.
What is First Amendment?Generally, According to the First Amendment, Congress is prohibited from passing any laws that "respect" an established religion or "prohibit" the free practice of religion.
Freedom of expression, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances are all safeguarded by this provision. The right of people to keep and bear weapons is guaranteed under the Second Amendment.
In conclusion, The court reached its decision by a vote count of 5 to 4, and found that the free speech section of the First Amendment bars the government from banning independent expenditures for political campaigns by companies, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other groups.
Read more about First Amendment
https://brainly.com/question/1078243
#SPJ1
Why is it extremely important that people have confidence in the court system
Answer:
If you aren't confident it can make you/your client look suspicious
Explanation:
Better Call Saul is an American crime and legal drama television series created by Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould. Part of the Breaking Bad franchise, it is a spin-off, prequel and sequel to Gilligan's previous series, Breaking Bad. Set primarily in the early-mid 2000s in Albuquerque, New Mexico, the series develops Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk), an earnest lawyer and former con artist, into an egocentric criminal defense attorney known as Saul Goodman. Also shown is the moral decline of former police officer Mike Ehrmantraut (Jonathan Banks), who becomes a violent fixer for drug traffickers to support his granddaughter and her widowed mother. The show premiered on AMC on February 8, 2015, and concluded on August 15, 2022, after six seasons consisting of 63 episodes.
At the start of the series, Jimmy struggles financially while he mostly works on court-appointed cases as a public defender. His romantic interest and former colleague, Kim Wexler (Rhea Seehorn), is an attorney at Hamlin, Hamlin & McGill (HHM), a law firm co-owned by Jimmy's brilliant but unwell brother, Chuck McGill (Michael McKean) and Chuck's law partner, Howard Hamlin (Patrick Fabian). After hiring Jimmy as legal representation, Mike provides advice and security for Nacho Varga (Michael Mando), an intelligent drug dealer who later becomes a mole for Gus Fring (Giancarlo Esposito), a drug lord and legitimate businessman as owner of the Los Pollos Hermanos fast food establishment. Their operations are disrupted by members of the murderous Salamanca family, including Lalo Salamanca (Tony Dalton). Odenkirk, Banks, and Esposito reprise their roles from Breaking Bad, as do many others who make guest appearances.
Better Call Saul has received critical acclaim, with particular praise for its acting, characters, writing, direction, and cinematography; many critics have called it a worthy successor to Breaking Bad and one of the greatest television series of all time, with some deeming it superior to its predecessor.[5][6][7] It has garnered many nominations, including a Peabody Award, 46 Primetime Emmy Awards, 15 Writers Guild of America Awards, 14 Critics' Choice Television Awards, six Screen Actors Guild Awards, and four Golden Globe Awards. At the time of its airing, the series premiere held the record for the highest-rated scripted series premiere in basic cable history.
Who would most likely apply for a copyright? Who would most likely apply for a
patent?
entrepreneurs lol because of their products they dont want ideas to get stolen
2. If you were going to study some aspect of crime, what research method would you use? Why would you use this method? What advantages would this method give you as you studied your topic?
Answer:
One common research method for studying crime is quantitative research, which involves the use of statistical analysis to examine patterns and relationships between variables. This method is advantageous because it can provide a large amount of data and allow for generalizations to be made about the population being studied. For example, a researcher may use quantitative research to study the relationship between poverty and crime rates in a particular city, using data from official crime reports and socioeconomic indicators.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court's power has increased over time as the nation has turned
to the Court to decide questions of federal and constitutional law. Do you think the
Court's importance will continue to increase or will it decrease? Explain.
Answer:
decrease because tax prices are going up
Explanation:
Why did the Roman people demand a new legal code?
(1 point)
O They were concerned that Roman Law did not extend to technological issues.
O They wanted to become a republic and needed new laws in place to do so.
O They were worried that older Roman Law hadn't yet been translated into Latin.
O They felt that their interests were secondary to those of priests and patricians.
In which of the following circumstances can a deposition be used in trial proceedings?
Responses:
Always. A deposition is a statement taken specifically to be used in the trial.
If a witness dies before she has a chance to testify.
If the jury asks to see more information about testimony offered during the trial.
If the opposing party does not like what the witness says during the trial.
Answer:
If the jury asks to see more information about testimony offered during the trial.
An appeal court can make one of three decisions, what are the three decisions
Answer:By upholding the original decision , Reversing that decision, Remanding the case
Explanation: