Answer:
17th Amedment
Explanation:
Passed by Congress May 13, 1912, and ratified April 8, 1913, the 17th amendment modified Article I, section 3, of the Constitution by allowing voters to cast direct votes for U.S. Senators. Prior to its passage, Senators were chosen by state legislatures.
Answer:
Answer B The 17th Amendment
Explanation:
Edge 2021
STATY
Question 5 of 5
A
shaped road is slightly higher at the
center and lower at the outer edges, allowing water to drain
off the road. Select your answer, then click or tap Submit.
O banked
O crowned
O flat
O hilly
A Crown - shaped road is slightly higher at the center and lower at the outer edges, allowing water to drain off the road. Hence the correct answer is (Option B).
What are the benefits of a Crown Shaped Road?
A high-crowned road has a higher center elevation than the sides. If the road is straight or bends to the left, the slope is not difficult to manage.
When a high-crowned road curves to the right, a rider may encounter difficulties since it is similar to turning on an incorrectly banked curve.
Puddles on highways increase the risk of aquaplaning, hence drainage or (crown shaped roads) are essential. As the road nears a corner, the outer lane is shifted upward to provide superelevation before the bend. The section of road where this occurs is known as the crown runoff.
Superelevation runoff is the inverse of crown runoff, in which a basically flat length of road is progressively slanted into the right superelevation angle before the corner.
Learn more about Crown Shaped Roads;
https://brainly.com/question/23118089
#SPJ1
Which amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects individual freedoms, including the freedom of expression (speech)?
The due process clause of the 14th Amendment had been "incorporated" by 1937 to include freedom of the press, expression, religion, assembly, and petition. Thus, the 14th Amendment, which placed restrictions on state laws and activities, was expanded to include these First Amendment rights.
A statute, contract, constitution, or other legal document may be amended formally or formally. Its foundation is the word "amend," which implies "to change for the better." These agreements may be updated, deleted, or have portions added. When changing a document is preferable to writing a new one, they are frequently employed. The procedure of amending laws is exclusive to the legislative branch. A motion is an initiative to do something in parliamentary procedure. A motion to amend can be used to update the wording of such a proposal. In motions, amendments can edit, add, or remove wording. It is possible to change some secondary motions but not all major motions. A modification may be changed.
Learn more about amended here
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ9
How does a global crisis happen?
Answer:
When people didn’t care about something, like a pandemic or enconomy crisis.
Explanation:
BRAINLIEST
Write 4-5 sentences about how the Right to Peacefully Assemble has changed overtime.
Answer:
Explanation:
Originally, the right to assemble was considered less important than the right to petition. Yet, over the years, the courts have interpreted the First Amendment and the right to peaceful assembly as significant in its importance to society today. The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the First Amendment protects the right to conduct a peaceful public assembly. The right to assemble is not, however, absolute. The Government officials cannot simply prohibit a public assembly, but the government can impose restrictions on the time, place, and manner of peaceful assembly, provided that constitutional safeguards are met.
Therefore, the Right to Assemble is of significant importance to U.S. society as it gives all citizens the freedom to have a voice and freely associate with one another in public under a common cause or shared value.
Brad earned his bachelor's degree in occupational health and safety from the university of Wisconsin last year, completing a semester long semester long internship along the way. he has been looking for a full time job as a health and safety specialist since then, but has not has much luck; the few companies who have called him back want him to fill a lower paying technician position.What is your assessment of what is going on here?
O Wisconsin In an OSHA free state: there are no obligations for places of business to provide health or safety information for their employees
O There is competition in his field and, while the he meets minimum education qualifications for the role, he is up again people higher degrees or additional certifications
O He is under qualified for the role he seeks; safety are required to have a master’s degree and, eventually, a licenses
O He is overqualified he seeks; most people in his position have an associate’s degree or a certification
Answer:
B. There is competition in his field, and while he meets minimum education qualifications for the role, he is up against people with higher degrees or additional certifications.
Explanation:
taking the test on edge
CRIMINAL JUSTICE NEED HELP ASAP!!
Punishments once considered cruel and unusual have decreased standards of decency have a evolved over the years.
True or False?
true everything evolves
Charlie was convicted by the highest court in Oregon and sent to prison. Charlie says that the conviction should be overturned and wants the case reviewed again. To which higher court can Charlie request this review?
A) State appeals court
B) State supreme court
C) U.S. Court of Appeals
D) U.S. Supreme Court
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
The highest court Charlie could request the review to would have to be the U.S. Supreme court. I did some researching and studying before answering this question. Hope i helped! :)
U.S. Supreme Court which higher court can Charlie request this review from.
What is court?A court is any person or institution with the jurisdiction to arbitrate legal disputes between parties and administer justice in civil, criminal, and administrative affairs in conformity with the rule of law. A court, often known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the legal jurisdiction to hear and settle disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military issues.
Charlie would have to ask the U.S. Supreme Court, which is the highest court, for a review. highest court. Before responding to your query, I performed some investigation and study.
Law is what courts are most interested in. The focus is on legal or private rights violations and how they affect individuals. In administrative decision-making, courts have a role. It is known as judicial review.
Therefore, Thus option (D) is correct.
Learn more about the court here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ2
BRAINLIEST!
Using the internet, research “The Freedom to Peacefully Assemble.” Write an explanation of how the interpretation of this right has changed over time.
Which of the following is NOT a requirement for dealing with hazardous materials?
A. Using good ventilation
B. Preventing toxic materials from being released
C. Wearing appropriate protective equipment
D. Determining wether it can be thrown away or not
Dealing with dangerous materials DOES NOT require determining whether something can be thrown away or not. As a result, Option (D) is the adequate answer.
What is meant by hazardous materials?Any object or agent that has the potential to harm people, animals, or the environment qualifies as a hazardous material, regardless of its biological, chemical, radiological, or physical nature. The material itself or its interactions with other materials may be to blame for this.
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission are largely responsible for defining and enforcing laws and regulations in this country regarding hazardous materials (NRC). A "hazardous material" is defined differently in each country.
Therefore, option (D) is the accurate answer.
Learn more about hazardous materials, from:
brainly.com/question/14309081
#SPJ2
how are u today
how was ur week
2 p
Who are the two Senators in Ohio, please choose two of the options
below.
Answer:
Rob Portman and Sherrod Brown
Explanation:
Brown is a Democrat and Rob is Republican
Answer:
Explanation:
rob portman and sherrod brown
Robert is doing a sweep of the house where he arrested a drug dealer He does
not have a warrant, but he saw an armed man inside the house. Why is this not a
violation of the Fourth Amendment?
A. He has probable cause
B. He used predictive policing
C. He did not have time to get a warrant
D. He was using the appropriate amount of force
What is statue of limitations?
O A. A procedural law which requires that the state file charges for
certain types of crime within a certain state
OB. A procedural law which requires that the state file charges for
certain types of crime within a certain amount of time
O C. A procedural law which requires that the state file charges for
certain types of crime involving a specific amount of money
D. A procedural law which requires that the state file charges for
certain types of crime involving a certain type of person
Answer:
the second one it is the answer
Explanation:
Rebekah believed that her business partner misused company funds for a vacation trip around the world. She is suing her for $20,000. Which court would hear this case?
1. US Supreme Court
2. US Court of Appeals
3. US District Court
4. State District Court
The court that would hear this case is the States District Court.
Jurisdiction refers to the authority of a formally constituted legal body such as Supreme court, Federal court, District court etc
The Federal jurisdiction cover case causing controversies between States, government and foreign governments.The States jurisdiction usually cover type of case such as Robberies, Traffic offences and other case relating to the state.
Therefore the Option D is correct because the court that would hear this case is the States District Court.
Read more about this here
brainly.com/question/15122297
select any issue related to children and families in which you are interested perform research on any existing laws connected to this issue write a short report on the policy or law what strategies would you suggest to improve the law?
Answer:
On any list of current issues in education, school funding ranks near the top. As you may be aware, the American public education system comprises primary and secondary schools supported by taxes. Over 90 percent of the funding for public K-12 schools comes from state and local governments.
Explanation:
critically assess the affectiveness (usefulness )of the south African crine prevention mechanisms
The South African government implemented four measures to decrease crime and violence. Since violence and crime cannot be stopped in a single or two-day period, implementation of these mechanisms will take time.
The government has implemented numerous monitoring and recruitment programs to increase police force vigilance. The four pillar mechanism consists of:
In order for criminals to receive equitable punishment for their crimes, the criminal justice process aims to make the legal system extremely effective.It guarantees a decrease in criminal activity and provides a definite deterrence for criminals.By building a system that lowers the likelihood of crime, environmental design for crime reduction improves the process of quickly detecting and identifying criminals.Education and public values: Educates the populace so that they can contribute to the fight against crime and violence.Transnational crimes are decreased through reducing cross-border trafficking.Learn more about crimes here
https://brainly.com/question/9997722
#SPJ9
Identify 2 purposes of the Court Systems
Put yourself in the place of one of the lawmakers in 1787. You are present to represent your state. At the end, you realize that you have experienced “the art of compromise.” How will you describe to your neighbor what this compromise means?
Answer:
the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.
the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.
Explanation:
Answer:
The art of compromise can be described as a solution or agreement to an argument or a disagreement between two (or more) parties where neither of the two parties gets what they initial wanted in full. However the two parties do end up having a beneficial outcome from the final decision as the solution of what they initially wanted. For instance say you bought a box of cookies for you to bring to your friend's house to enjoy at a party. Later after some time at the party there was one cookie left, and you want to eat that cookie. However your friend also wants to eat that cookie, so instead of fighting for the cookie and only one of you end up happy. You cut the cookie in half making it into two cookies so that both you and your friend get what was wanted; just not in full.
Challenge #9 To decide about heredity You are destined to be a criminal I know You will break the law You are just like your bro. What kind of explanation is this? You inherited genes that make you a criminal Your answer O This is a required question
Answer: this is wrong. Because my brother is a criminal doesn’t mean that I could be a harmful member of society. I could be very different from him.
Explanation:
A is introduced by placing it in the______. Next, it is discussed in_______
It then continues to the_______
If passed there it goes to the_______
The final step is for it to go to the_______
Answer:
Explanation:
A bill is introduced by placing it in a wooden box called the hooper
Next it is discussed in the Committee
It then continues to where the Congress debates and voting takes place
If passed there it goes to the US senate
The final step is for it to go to the President
Is it possible to balance individual rights and personal freedoms with social control and respect for legitimate authority? Why or why not?
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, I do believe that it is possible to balance individual rights and personal freedoms with social control and respect for legitimate authority because: Individual rights are the rights that are guaranteed to all American Citizens from the U.S. Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.
A balance between individual rights and social control is possible through a set of democratic and participatory laws.
What are individual rights?Individual rights is a term that refers to the freedoms and rights that an individual has from the moment he is born. Among these rights are the right to move freely, the right to think and express oneself freely, among others.
What is control and authority?Control and authority are terms that refer to the control that the state has over individuals so that society is in harmony and the lives of citizens are not disturbed.
In accordance with the above, it can be inferred that it is possible that there is a balance between these two concepts. In fact, in most democratic states today, individual rights allow the control and legitimate authority of the state.
Learn more about individual rights in: https://brainly.com/question/619133
#SPJ1
Can animal wildlife protection be an amendment, or do amendment have to affect humans?
which of the following are the examples of print media.
a, newspaper and journals.
b, tabloids and books.
c, both a and b.
Answer:
both a and b
Explanation:
becase they both are printed but I don't know about tabloid it is new for me
plz reply
Answer: C - both a and b
Explanation:
Why would a congressional district be drawn in the odd shape?
im in a poly relationship rn, any advice?? <3
Answer:
Just make sure you are doing what is best for you because in the end you are more important
Explanation:
Why is amendment 26 important?
Answer: Forty years ago, the 26th Amendment to the United States Constitution took effect, lowering the universal voting age in America from 21 years to 18 years. Millions of young Americans were extended the right to vote, empowering more young people than ever before to help shape our country.
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP QUICK DO SOON! THANK YOU! :) What do some criminalologists feel might be a drawback to privitzation of prisons? -The prison system would start releasing inmates before the court allowed. -The state or county would have nothing to do with their budgets. -The prison system would become less productive -The prison system might begin to cut corners on care to save money.
Answer: The state or county would have nothing to do with their budgets.
Explanation:
Answer: the prison system might begin to cut corners on care to save money.
Explanation: i put the answer the person above me gave and i got it incorrect so it showed me the correct answer.
What is embossed on the holder's picture on a California Real ID?
a. their name
b. their driver license number
c. their birthdate
d. their signature
The driver license number is embossed on the holder's picture on a California Real ID. The appropriate response is option B.
What is California Real ID?A REAL ID is a driver's license or identification card that also serves as a form of federal identification. It can be used to board a domestic flight within the United States as well as gain access to secure federal facilities such as military bases, federal courthouses, and other secure federal locations.
A REAL ID driver's license or identification card issued by California meets new requirements and is marked with a gold bear and star.
A REAL ID application requires proof of identity, California residency, and a visit to a DMV office. On the REAL ID application, provide your Social Security number.
The driver license number is embossed on the holder's picture on a California Real ID.
Hence, Option B is an appropriate response.
To learn more about California Real ID
https://brainly.com/question/27870342
#SPJ2
Is this right? Please help
Answer: the answer A. seems to be the right one instead! Best of luck!
Who is responsible for serving jury duty?
Answer:
anyone above the age of 18 and enrolled to vote.
Explanation:
being able to serve as a juror gives peoples of a community the opportunity to play an active role in the administration of justice.