Answer:
probably d
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Many slaves who escaped from masters in Texas or in the United States joined various East Texas Indian tribes. Although not considered equals in the tribes, they were generally treated well
Help needed ASAP will give BRAINLIEST and 5 STARS RATE
Answer:
The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.
Explanation:
The doctrine that the God knows from the beginning of time who will be saved
Answer: Predestination
Explanation: This Christian doctrine speaks that, although it is true that God knows everything that is going to happen, he lets it happen since there is something that human beings have and that is free will. God, if he wants, can destroy the world since he knows when the end of things will be, but he lets things happen as faith in humanity that they can change.
Speakeasies and bootleggers were a product of:
A. segregation
B. debt.
C. Prohibition
D. unemployment.
Answer:
C. Prohibition
Explanation:
What did the Tariff of 1816 do?
A. It taxed American goods exported to Europe.
B. It taxed imported French goods, but not British goods.
C. It imposed a sales tax on imported goods.
D. It taxed all foreign goods imported to the United States.
Answer:
A. it taxed American goods exported to Europe or other foreign lands. Hope this helps!
Answer:
The correct answer is D. It taxed all foreign goods imported to the United States.
Explanation:
I just took the qc and the other answers are...
1. What conditions contributed to Congress’s vote to authorize a declaration of war in 1812? Select the two correct answers.
westward expansion of British Canada & U.S. sympathy for the French Revolution
2. What did Tecumseh want?
to revive Native American traditions
3. Before becoming president, James Madison served as which of the following?
Secretary of State
ur welcome :)
The revolt at Anahuac ended with
a. the return of Stephen F. Austin
b. the outbreak of malaria
the surrender of Captain Tenorio's forces
d. the surrender of William B. Travis
C.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
d. the surrender of William B. Travis.Explanation:
I hope l have answered your question and please follow me.❤❤❤The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police
Answer:
may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio and Horton v. California ruled that the police, in certain cases, can search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
Terry v. Ohio was the case, of which the Supreme Court gave verdict on June 10, 1968, in which the Supreme Court ruled that police can search individuals or seize property without a warrant. In Terry v. Ohio, the case was when a local plice officer suspected Terry and his two accomplice were upto something, possibly robbing of a store, searched them and found them armed with pistols.
And, in Horton v. California case, Seargent LaRault got warrant to search on the property of Horton, who was suspected of robbery, and found criminal weapons used at the time of robbery. Because the warrant only permitted of searching and not seizure of property, the Supreme Court gave verdict that in such cases, police can seize the property without warrant.
So, the correct answer is that the Supreme Court gave verdict that police in some cases can have warrantless individual search and seizure of property.
Answer:
may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio and Horton v. California ruled that the police, in certain cases, can search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
Terry v. Ohio was the case, of which the Supreme Court gave verdict on June 10, 1968, in which the Supreme Court ruled that police can search individuals or seize property without a warrant. In Terry v. Ohio, the case was when a local plice officer suspected Terry and his two accomplice were upto something, possibly robbing of a store, searched them and found them armed with pistols.
And, in Horton v. California case, Seargent LaRault got warrant to search on the property of Horton, who was suspected of robbery, and found criminal weapons used at the time of robbery. Because the warrant only permitted of searching and not seizure of property, the Supreme Court gave verdict that in such cases, police can seize the property without warrant.
So, the correct answer is that the Supreme Court gave verdict that police in some cases can have warrantless individual search and seizure of property.
Economically, by the time of Justinian, the Byzantine Empire
was still struggling to keep up with the trade of Western Europe
was far wealthier than the small states of the former Roman Empire in the West
was still held back by the lack of a port to the sea
had developed and abandoned a feudal society
By the time of Justinian, the Byzantine Empire's economy was far wealthier than the small states of the former Roman Empire in the West.
What was the economy like under Justinian?When Justinian became emperor of the Byzantine empire, the empire's economy was quite prosperous.
This meant that they were far more wealthy than the small states that had come out of the Roman Empire in the West after that empire had fallen to different tribes.
Find out more on the Byzantine Empire at https://brainly.com/question/1446842
#SPJ1
Answer: was still struggling to keep up with the trade of Western Europe
Explanation:
What is your definiton of freedom?
Answer: Freedom, generally, is having the ability to act or change without constraint.
Explanation: A person has the freedom to do things that will not, in theory, or in practice, be prevented by other forces.
Hope this helps!! Brainlist Plz?!
how were the colonies before the seven years war
Answer:
Prior to the Seven Years War, the Colonists in Maryland Were Faithful
Subjects of the King and Lived Under the Protection of the British Military
Explanation:
In 1754, Maryland was a colony of Great Britain. People living in Maryland were
considered to be English citizens and they were governed by British laws. The colony
was ruled by a Royal Governor that reported directly to the King. The colonists
depended upon British merchants to supply them with many important items in their
daily lives including tools, clothing, furniture and weapons.
These goods were sailed across the Atlantic Ocean in large
ships and delivered to ports such as Annapolis, Baltimore,
Oxford, Cambridge and Chester (now Chestertown). In
return, colonial merchants sailed raw materials such as corn,
grain, tobacco and lumber to England. Daily life in
Maryland in 1754 often centered around activities that took
place on the water. Since nearly all trade goods traveled by
boat, most of Maryland’s homes were located within easy
walking distance of a major river. Rivers also provided the
colonists with an important source of food. In the spring,
striped bass, shad and herring were netted by the thousands
as the fish made their annual migrations up the Bay’s rivers
and streams. The Bay’s abundant oyster bars also added a
valuable source of protein to the colonists’ diets.
One of the greatest benefits to being an English
colony was receiving protection from the British military.
This was critical because the colonists had no established
military of their own. As a result, they lived under the
constant threat of invasion by the French and the Spanish,
who were struggling with England for control of North America. Without British
protection, either one of these world powers could have easily overtaken the colonists
and their lands.
In 1755, tensions between England and France led to the beginning of a conflict
known as the Seven Years War. From 1755 to 1762, English and French forces battled
each other throughout the Ohio Valley and Canada for control over the eastern half of
North America. Eventually, the French were driven from their lands and forced to
abandon their North American empire. When the war ended in 1763 with a convincing
English victory, it also left the country with a very large debt. As a result, King George
III decided to raise money by taxing the thirteen colonies. Disagreements over how
these taxes were created and enforced would soon change the relationship between
England and its thirteen colonies forever.
why did France declare war on Austria?
Answer:
because they thought war would unify the country.
Explanation:
Know what conservative response to the Great Depression was
Answer:
The Conservative Response: Let the Economy Stabilize
Explanation:
who won King Phillip's
Answer:
New England's English settlers
Explanation:
Answer:
Metacom, also known as Pometacom, Metacomet, and by his adopted English name King Philip, was sachem to the Wampanoag people and the second son of the Sachem Massasolt. Metacom became Sachem In 1662 when his brother Wamsutta died shortly after the death of their father.
definition of history
History is the science that studies the past.
Who is called the "Father of the Constitution" because of his work at the
Constitutional Convention?
O A. James Madison
OB. Alexander Hamilton
OC. Daniel Shays
OD. Patrick Henry
Answer:
james madison that is the answer
Answer:
James Madison
Explanation:
He contributed to the Constitution a lot. That is why he is called the father of it.
the invention of the alphabet and the subsequent spread of literacy had a leveling effect on society; it eventually diminished the power of priests/scribes found in earlier societies.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
rewrite this quote and explain its significance, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness".
Answer:
We find that these truths are self-explanitory. all men and women are created the same, they have been trusted by their religious god to be faithful.
Explanation:
What is a reason colonists used to justify using violence against Native Americans?
O The Native Americans attacked the colonists first.
O The colonists felt that the Native Americans were hiding gold.
O There was a deep sense of respect between the Native Americans and the colonists.
O The colonists felt the Native Americans were not using the land correctly.
Why can’t the end of the Roman Empire be explained by a single cause?
Answer:
All most nothing can be explained with one cause, the fall of the Roman Empire was due to many factors.
Explanation:
What was one of the major French accomplishments in North America?
a. They explored New Mexico and brought sheep.
b. They established a demand for hats made from sheepskin.
c. They promoted the use of silk for making shoes.
d. They explored the St. Lawrence River and brought missionaries.
France established colonies in much of eastern North America, on a number of Caribbean islands, and in South America. Most colonies were developed to export products such as fish, rice, sugar, and furs.
The Conquest of the North AmericaLike the Spanish, the French also wanted to convert the "pagan" (one who is not Christian, Muslim, or Jewish) Native Americans to Roman Catholicism, thus combining conquest with a Christian mission. Hence, the answer is:
d. They explored the St. Lawrence River and brought missionaries.Therefore, the answer is D
learn more about French invasion of the North America from here: https://brainly.com/question/310840
Answer:
D, They explored the St. Lawrence River and brought missionaries.
Explanation:
Edge 2022
Have a great day <3
PLEASE HURRY
As events like the Vietnam War, war protests, energy crises, and the collapse of Penn Square Bank demonstrate, the 1960s and 1970s were a time of for many Oklahomans.
A. Success
B. tranquility
C. turmoil
D. inactivity
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Answer:
Turmoil
Explanation:
what happened when the Germany started paying war loans ?
Answer:
Following the ratification of article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles at the conclusion of World War I, the Central Powers were compelled to give war reparations to the Allied Powers. Each of the defeated powers were required to make payments in either cash or kind. Because of the financial situation in Austria, Hungary, and Turkey after the war, few to no reparations were paid and the requirements for reparations were cancelled. Bulgaria, having paid only a fraction of what was required, saw its reparation figure reduced and then cancelled. Historians have recognized the German requirement to pay reparations as the "chief battleground of the post-war era" and "the focus of the power struggle between France and Germany over whether the Versailles Treaty was to be enforced or revised".[1]
The Treaty of Versailles (signed in 1919) and the 1921 London Schedule of Payments required Germany to pay 132 billion gold marks (US$33 billion [all values are contemporary, unless otherwise stated]) in reparations to cover civilian damage caused during the war. This figure was divided into three categories of bonds: A, B, and C. Of these, Germany was required to pay towards 'A' and 'B' bonds totaling 50 billion marks (US$12.5 billion) unconditionally. The payment of the remaining 'C' bonds was interest free and contingent on the Weimar Republic's ability to pay, as was to be assessed by an Allied committee.
Due to the lack of reparation payments by Germany, France occupied the Ruhr in 1923 to enforce payments, causing an international crisis that resulted in the implementation of the Dawes Plan in 1924. This plan outlined a new payment method and raised international loans to help Germany to meet its reparation commitments. Despite this, by 1928 Germany called for a new payment plan, resulting in the Young Plan that established the German reparation requirements at 112 billion marks (US$26.3 billion) and created a schedule of payments that would see Germany complete payments by 1988. With the collapse of the German economy in 1931, reparations were suspended for a year and in 1932 during the Lausanne Conference they were cancelled altogether. Between 1919 and 1932, Germany paid less than 21 billion marks in reparations.
The German people saw reparations as a national humiliation; the German Government worked to undermine the validity of the Treaty of Versailles and the requirement to pay. British economist John Maynard Keynes called the treaty a Carthaginian peace that would economically destroy Germany. His arguments had a profound effect on historians, politicians, and the public at large. Despite Keynes' arguments and those by later historians supporting or reinforcing Keynes' views, the consensus of contemporary historians is that reparations were not as intolerable as the Germans or Keynes had suggested and were within Germany's capacity to pay had there been the political will to do so. Following the Second World War, West Germany took up payments. The 1953 London Agreement on German External Debts resulted in an agreement to pay 50 per cent of the remaining balance. The final payment was made on 3 October 2010, settling German loan debts in regard to reparations.
Background
German reaction
Evolution of reparations
Analysis
See also
Notes
References
Further reading
The map shows physical features in and around the Arabian Peninsula.
Which letter on the map identifies the Caspian Sea?
A.
b.
c.
d.
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
What is one way the economy of the global South differs from that of the global North?
A The global South holds a much smaller population of the world's people than does the global North.
B. The global South contains many of the Earth's natural resources, while the global North includes many of the world's rich industrial nations.
C. The average living income in the global South is much higher than that of the global North.
D. Population growth is greater in the global North than in the global South
Answer:
E.The term North-South division is used to refer to the social, economic and political division that exists between developed countries, also known as countries of the North or Global North, and the less developed countries of the "South" or Global South.
According to Martin Luther, the only authority for Christian living is the Bible. true or false
What is the second question answer ??
Answer:
option 2
Explanation:
please Mark me brainliest
____ were less expensive to maintain than paid employees?
politicians
militia
enslaved people
children
women
Answer:
childre
Explanation:
Who oversaw the Jamestown settlement, the King, or
the Virginia Company?
Answer: King James I granted the Virginia Company a royal charter for the colonial pursuit in 1606. The Company had the power to appoint a Council of leaders in the colony, a Governor, and other officials. It also took the responsibility to continually provide settlers, supplies, and ships for the venture.
Explanation:
What was the Edo Period?
O A new era of constant warfare
A new era of unification and peace that led to nearly 200 years of increasing Japanese population, wealth, knowledge, and infrastructure
O A new era of trade with the Muslims
O A new era of converting to a western religion
Help asap
Answer:
Correct answer is A new era of unification and peace that led to nearly 200 years of increasing Japanese population, wealth, knowledge, and infrastructure .
Explanation:
Second option is correct because this was one of the most prosperous period of Japanese history, also known as Tokugawa period. It was a period of isolation, when Japan developed.
All other options are not correct, because Japanese weren't allowing influence from the outside.
What part of the government makes new laws?
A. He carries out laws all by himself.
B. He decides if laws are broken.
C. He works to create new laws.
D. He does not have to follow the laws.
Answer: I believe the answer is c.
Explanation:
How was the Northwest Territory intially governed under the Northwest Ordinance of 1787?
O The British government ruled the territory.
O The French government ruled the territory.
O A single government ruled the entire territory.
O Various state governments ruled different parts of the territory.