Answer: Two Cold War events that had a significant impact on the U.S. decision to pursue détente (a period of relaxed tensions) are the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Vietnam War.
Cuban Missile Crisis (1962): This event marked a critical moment of confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union, as the Soviets attempted to install nuclear missiles in Cuba, just 90 miles off the coast of Florida. The crisis brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. The intense standoff and the fear of escalation led both sides to recognize the dangers of direct conflict and the need for improved communication and negotiations. The resolution of the crisis highlighted the importance of diplomacy and peaceful solutions, influencing the subsequent U.S. approach towards détente.
Vietnam War (1955-1975): The Vietnam War was a protracted conflict that drew significant resources and attention from the United States. It exposed the limitations of military intervention and highlighted the complexities of fighting wars in the Cold War context. The costly and divisive nature of the war prompted a reassessment of U.S. foreign policy priorities. It led to a realization that military force alone might not be the most effective means to achieve desired outcomes, and that alternative approaches, such as diplomatic engagement and negotiated settlements, could be more beneficial.
These two events, among others, played a crucial role in shaping the U.S. perspective on the necessity of pursuing détente. They underscored the dangers and risks associated with heightened tensions and military confrontations, leading the United States to seek avenues for peaceful coexistence and diplomatic solutions to the Cold War conflicts.
Explanation: :)
Answer:
Cuban Missile Crisis and Vietnam War
Explanation:
Two Cold War events that had a significant impact on the U.S. decision to pursue détente were the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Vietnam War.
Cuban Missile Crisis: The Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 was a major confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union. The presence of Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba brought the two superpowers to the brink of nuclear war. The crisis highlighted the dangers of direct confrontation and the potential catastrophic consequences of a full-scale nuclear conflict. It led to a realization that both sides needed to find a way to ease tensions and establish more stable and predictable relations.
Vietnam War: The Vietnam War, which lasted from the mid-1950s to the mid-1970s, was a protracted conflict between North Vietnam (supported by the Soviet Union and China) and South Vietnam (supported by the United States and its allies). The war had a significant impact on the U.S. domestically, politically, and economically. It was a costly and divisive conflict that led to a reevaluation of U.S. foreign policy and the recognition that military intervention and containment strategies had limitations. The Vietnam War contributed to a growing desire for a more peaceful and cooperative approach to international relations, leading to the pursuit of détente as a means to reduce tensions and seek diplomatic solutions.
Both events demonstrated the potential dangers and limitations of the aggressive and confrontational approaches that characterized earlier phases of the Cold War. They played a role in shaping the U.S. decision to pursue détente, a policy aimed at reducing hostility, promoting arms control, and fostering dialogue and cooperation between the United States and the Soviet Union.
which argument in the petitions of slaves to the massachusetts legislature employed the principles of the american revolution? a. british soldiers did not belong in the homes of bostonians. b. one of the people killed during the boston massacre was of african heritage. c. taxing the poor created an economic burden. d. slaves could be productive soldiers. e. natural rights were universal.
The argument in the petitions of slaves to the Massachusetts legislature that employed the principles of the American Revolution was the idea of natural rights being universal.
The American Revolution was fought in part over the idea that all people, regardless of their social status or background, had inherent rights that could not be taken away by the government. The slaves who petitioned the legislature were arguing that they too were entitled to these natural rights, such as freedom and equality, and that their enslavement was a violation of these rights. The other arguments listed, such as the presence of British soldiers in Boston and the economic burden of taxing the poor, were important issues during the American Revolution but did not directly relate to the principle of natural rights.
To know more about massachusetts legislature visit;
https://brainly.com/question/25327834
#SPJ11
40 POINT QOUSTION PLEASE ANSWER IN TEN MINUTES.
To get the candidate they support elected, interest groups set up PACs which …?
Group of answer choices
get people to vote
bring cases to court
raise awareness
raise money
Answer:
Raise Money
Explanation:
Political Action Committee (PAC) — A popular term for a political committee organized for the purpose of raising and spending money to elect and defeat candidates. Most PACs represent business, labor or ideological interests. PACs can give $5,000 to a candidate committee per election (primary, general or special).
¿Por qué las potencias del mundo buscan controlar Medio Oriente?
One of the main reasons why world powers seek to control the Middle East is the abundance of natural resources that the region possesses, such as oil and natural gas.
The Middle East is home to some of the world's largest oil reserves, making it an important resource for global energy production and consumption.
As a result, many countries seek to establish political and economic influence in the region to secure access to these resources and gain control over their distribution.
In addition to natural resources, the Middle East is also strategically located at the crossroads of three continents: Europe, Asia, and Africa. This makes the region a crucial transit point for international trade and commerce, making it an important hub for transportation and logistics
Learn more about The Middle east at:
https://brainly.com/question/30204460
#SPJ11
if jews and romans had a low view of women during the first-century, and they typically weren't viewed as credible sources, why would the gospel writers say that a group of women found the tomb of jesus empty?
The gospel writers included the account of women finding the tomb of Jesus empty to emphasize the authenticity and credibility of the resurrection narrative.
In the cultural context of the first century, both Jewish and Roman societies generally held a low view of women and did not consider them as credible witnesses. However, the gospel writers deliberately highlighted the women's discovery of the empty tomb to underscore the veracity of their accounts. By including this detail, the writers were not only challenging the prevailing societal norms but also emphasizing that the resurrection of Jesus was not a fabricated story.
The inclusion of women as the first witnesses served to highlight the unexpected and remarkable nature of the event, reinforcing the notion that the resurrection was a significant and genuine event in Christian belief.
Learn more about Jesus
https://brainly.com/question/510889
#SPJ4
¿Cuál de las siguientes aseveraciones de la economía de P. R. Es falsa?
Select one:
a. Existe fuerza obrera con gran capacidad empresarial y tecnológica. B. En P. R. , la tasa de desempleo es mayor que en EU. C. Los individuos dependen más de las transferencias federales en P. R. Que en E. U. , por la pobreza mayor. D. La economía de P. R. Ha logrado un alto grado de autosuficiencia (es poco dependiente).
Among the following statements of the economy of P.R., the false statement is "The economy of P.R. has achieved a high degree of self-sufficiency (it is less dependent)".
So, the answer is D.
The economy of Puerto Rico is dependent on the United States for many reasons.
Puerto Rico's economic growth and development were always constrained by its reliance on the United States, which had a significant impact on the economy.
As a result, most of Puerto Rico's economy is based on the US economy. Puerto Rico's economy, which is centered on government spending, has been struggling since the early 2000s.
There are also several other problems with Puerto Rico's economy, including an aging population, a decreasing workforce, and an outmigration of workers. As a result, the economy of Puerto Rico is largely dependent on the United States for its survival, and it has yet to achieve self-sufficiency.
Hence, the answer of the question is D.
Learn more about Puerto Rico at:
https://brainly.com/question/29272982
#SPJ11
a conflict that was between the us and the soviet union. the nations never directly confronted each other on the battlefield but deadly threats went on for years.
The conflict that fits the description is the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. The Cold War, which lasted from the late 1940s to the early 1990s, was characterized by intense political, economic, and ideological rivalry between the two superpowers.
Although direct military confrontation between the US and the Soviet Union did not occur, the threat of nuclear warfare loomed large throughout the period. Both nations engaged in a race to develop and stockpile nuclear weapons, leading to the concept of mutually assured destruction (MAD). Proxy wars, espionage, and propaganda campaigns were also common features of the Cold War, with the United States and the Soviet Union supporting opposing sides in conflicts around the world.
The Cold War had a profound impact on global politics, shaping alliances, influencing domestic policies, and maintaining a state of tension and hostility between the two powers.
To learn more about Cold War, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12698715
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects colonial attitudes regarding the Declaration of Independence from Great Britain? a) The colonists were unanimous in their support of independence.
b) The colonists were divided on the issue of independence. c) The colonists did not care about independence.
Your answer: The statement that most accurately reflects colonial attitudes regarding the Declaration of Independence from Great Britain is b) The colonists were divided on the issue of independence.
The most accurate statement regarding colonial attitudes towards the Declaration of Independence from Great Britain is that the colonists were divided on the issue of independence. While there were certainly many colonists who supported independence and were enthusiastic about breaking away from British rule, there were also many who were hesitant or even opposed to the idea. This divide was reflected in the Continental Congress, where there were debates and disagreements about the wording and content of the Declaration of Independence itself. It's important to note that colonial attitudes towards independence were complex and varied, and cannot be boiled down to a simple binary of support or opposition. Understanding the diversity of opinions and perspectives within the colonial community is key to understanding the historical context of the Declaration of Independence and its significance as a turning point in American history.
To know more about Declaration of Independence visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30410454
#SPJ11
Why did the scapegoating of Jewish people happen during these times of political and economic trouble in Germany?
The scapegoating of Jewish people in Germany during times of political and economic trouble was a result of a combination of historical anti-Semitism, the exploitation of societal vulnerabilities, and the rise of extremist ideologies that sought to deflect blame onto a marginalized group.
The scapegoating of Jewish people during times of political and economic trouble in Germany can be attributed to a combination of historical, social, and ideological factors. In the early 20th century, Germany experienced significant political instability and economic turmoil, including the aftermath of World War I and the Great Depression. These challenging circumstances created a fertile ground for the rise of extremist ideologies, such as Nazism, which sought to blame specific groups for the nation's problems.
Anti-Semitism, which had deep-rooted historical roots in Europe, was exploited by Nazi propaganda to provide a convenient scapegoat. Jews were portrayed as a unified and malevolent force, held responsible for various societal issues, including economic crises, political unrest, and cultural decay. The Nazis used this rhetoric to rally support, divert attention from the failures of their governance, and consolidate power.
Furthermore, long-standing prejudices and stereotypes against Jews, fueled by religious and cultural differences, made them vulnerable targets during times of social unrest. The Nazi regime, with its systematic propaganda, suppression of dissent, and implementation of discriminatory policies, effectively manipulated public sentiment to scapegoat the Jewish population and legitimize their persecution.
For more questions about Jewish people
https://brainly.com/question/17942527
#SPJ8
an innovation instituted by international harvester in 1926 was
International Harvester introduced a major innovation in 1926 with the release of the Farmall tractor. This was the first successful general-purpose tractor, designed to be used on all types of farms.
It was a significant improvement over previous tractors, which were often too specialized and limited in their capabilities. The Farmall was smaller, lighter, and more maneuverable than earlier models, making it easier to operate and handle. It also had a gasoline-powered engine, which was more reliable and efficient than the steam engines used in many earlier tractors. The Farmall revolutionized agriculture and paved the way for modern farming practices.
To know more about Harvester visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31380322
#SPJ11
What do the situations in Venezuela, Vietnam and Ethiopia have in common?
the first large wave of immigrants to the united states, from the time of independence until the 1880s, was mostly from:
The first large wave of immigrants to the United States, from the time of independence until the 1880s, was mostly from northern and western Europe.
This included immigrants from countries like England, Ireland, Germany, and Scandinavia. The reasons for this migration were varied, but many were seeking economic opportunity and religious freedom.
During the mid-19th century, there was also a significant influx of Chinese immigrants, who primarily worked on the railroad and in mining industries. However, this immigration was met with hostility and discrimination, resulting in the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which banned all Chinese immigration to the United States.
The immigration patterns of the late 19th and early 20th centuries were quite different, with a shift towards southern and eastern European immigrants. This wave of immigration was met with even more hostility and discrimination, with the passage of laws such as the Immigration Act of 1924, which limited the number of immigrants allowed from certain countries.
Overall, immigration has played a significant role in shaping the United States and its demographics, and continues to do so today.
To know more about immigrants visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13688875
#SPJ11
HELP ASAP
How do Washington tribes activity benefit Washington State economically and environmentally?
Tribes in Washington are making significant investments in the state's quality of life.
Washington’s 29 tribal governments are making significant investments in the state’s quality of life. They are large employers, fiscally independent governments, and contributors to the public good. Growing tribal economies fund schools, housing programs, health clinics, environmental rehabilitation, infrastructure, law enforcement, firefighting, and other public services.
American Indians were rooted in the land, sea, and rivers of what is now Washington long before national and state boundaries were drawn. Tribal governments will not come and go based on new incentives, any more than the government of Washington could move to Illinois. Tribal enterprise profits accrue to these permanent fixtures of the Washington economy (rather than to shareholders distributed across global capital markets). As reservation economies grow from a position below prevailing conditions in Washington, they bring underutilized resources—especially people—into more productive participation in the state economy. Tribes do this without imposing fiscal burdens on the state to cover, for example, the cost of good gaming regulation or municipal road construction adjacent to reservations. And tribes rely heavily on the off-reservation economy for goods, services, and labor, meaning that reservation economic growth quickly registers in the larger economy and, accordingly, in the Washington treasury. Especially in remote rural locations, tribes can be substantial net contributors to regional growth. Tribals follow environmental conservation rules in harvesting edible plants which establish ecological prudence. Tubers of edible plants like those of Dioscorea spp. are harvested by tribals when the leaves of the vine turn yellow and have physiologically matured.
Ecology works with Tribes in a government-to-government relationship to protect and manage shared natural resources and to cooperate across jurisdictions. The unique legal status of Tribes and the presence of treaty-reserved rights and cultural interests throughout the state create a special relationship between Tribes and agencies responsible for managing and protecting the state's natural resources.
To learn more about Washington Tribes
https://brainly.com/question/22689098
the cotton boom enriched planters as well as manufacturers and
The cotton boom of the mid-19th century brought unprecedented prosperity to planters, manufacturers, and other entrepreneurs involved in the cotton trade.
Planters, who were predominantly wealthy white landowners, saw their profits soar as cotton prices rose and demand increased. They were able to expand their plantations, buy more slaves, and invest in other ventures. Manufacturers, on the other hand, benefited from the cheap and abundant supply of raw cotton, which they could process and sell for a hefty profit. This led to the growth of textile mills and other industries in the North and England, which helped fuel the Industrial Revolution. However, this boom also perpetuated the cruel and inhumane system of slavery that underpinned the cotton economy.
To know more about cotton boom visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29392746
#SPJ11
how might tecumseh have benefited from studying european history
Tecumseh, a prominent Native American leader in the early 19th century, could have benefited from studying European history in several ways.
Firstly, he could have gained a better understanding of European culture and values, which would have allowed him to communicate more effectively with European leaders and negotiate more favorable treaties. Additionally, studying European military tactics and strategies would have helped him to better defend his people against European encroachment on Native lands. Furthermore, learning about the political and economic systems of European nations would have given him insights into how to build and maintain a strong and prosperous Native American community. In short, studying European history could have equipped Tecumseh with the knowledge and skills needed to protect and advance the interests of his people in a rapidly changing world.
To know more about Tecumseh visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1373026
#SPJ11
what was lincoln's public position on slavery? based on this position, were southerners' fears that a lincoln presidency threatened the institution of slavery founded or unfounded? why?
Abraham Lincoln's public position on slavery was that he was personally opposed to it Southerners' fears that a Lincoln presidency threatened the institution of slavery were founded in the sense that Lincoln's Republican Party was openly anti-slavery, and many Republicans believed that slavery should be abolished.
but recognized that the federal government did not have the power to abolish it where it already existed. He believed that the institution of slavery was morally wrong and that it should not be allowed to expand into new territories. However, he also believed that the rights of states to determine their own laws should be respected.
However, Lincoln himself had made it clear that he did not intend to abolish slavery where it already existed. Instead, he proposed a gradual plan of compensated emancipation, in which slave owners would be paid for freeing their slaves.
Despite Lincoln's moderate position on slavery, many southerners still viewed him as a threat to their way of life. They believed that his election would embolden abolitionists and lead to the eventual abolition of slavery. This fear was compounded by the fact that many Republicans, including Lincoln, believed that slavery was a moral evil that needed to be eliminated. In the end, these fears played a significant role in the outbreak of the Civil War.
To know more about slavery visit;
https://brainly.com/question/866336
#SPJ11
. in the context of the text, what bias could creep into the thought process of a brahmin historian vis-a-vis a non-brahmin historian?
In the context of the text, a brahmin historian might be biased towards portraying their own community in a more positive light compared to other communities. This could stem from their own personal beliefs and cultural conditioning.
The brahmin historian might also tend to emphasize the importance of religious and spiritual practices, while downplaying the role of social, economic and political factors in shaping history. This could result in a distorted version of events that presents a sanitized and idealized version of the past. Additionally, the brahmin historian might also be biased towards preserving the traditional power structures of society, which could mean marginalizing the contributions of non-brahmin communities. In contrast, a non-brahmin historian might focus on highlighting the struggles and achievements of marginalized communities, and may be more critical of the role played by dominant groups. However, this could also result in a skewed representation of history if the non-brahmin historian ignores or downplays the achievements of the brahmin community. Therefore, it is important for historians to be aware of their own biases and strive to present a balanced and nuanced account of history.
To know more about brahmin historian visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7451335
#SPJ11
The Spanish colony was divided into provinces, but today Central America is made up of independent republics.
The transformation from the Spanish colony divided into provinces to the independent republics of Central America signifies the historical shift towards self-governance and the establishment of sovereign nations in the region.
The transition from the Spanish colony, which was divided into provinces, to the independent republics of Central America marks a significant historical transformation. This evolution reflects the journey of the region towards self-determination and the establishment of sovereign nations. Over time, Central America underwent a process of decolonization and political restructuring, leading to the emergence of independent republics such as Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica. This shift allowed the peoples of Central America to exercise greater autonomy and shape their own destinies. The establishment of these independent republics represents a pivotal moment in the region's history, as it signifies the triumph of national identities and the desire for self-governance among the Central American nations.In conclusion, the transition from a Spanish colony divided into provinces to the independent republics of Central America highlights the region's journey towards self-governance, autonomy, and the establishment of sovereign nations.
For more such questions on Spanish colony:
https://brainly.com/question/646356
#SPJ8
Which of the following best describes the artist’s likely purpose in painting this particular subject?
Group of answer choices
a) To advocate for violent rebellion against British colonial authorities
b) To call for greater emigration by Europeans to the West Indies
c) To argue for the respectability of free people of color
d) To demonstrate the racial oppression suffered by free people of color in the West Indies
To demonstrate the racial oppression suffered by free people of color in the West Indies. (D)
Based on the given options, the most likely purpose of the painting is to highlight the racial oppression experienced by free people of color in the West Indies. The artist's intention appears to be to bring attention to the unjust treatment and discrimination faced by individuals of African descent who were considered free but still subjected to racial oppression.
The painting likely aims to shed light on the systemic and social inequalities prevalent in the West Indies during that time. By portraying the experiences of free people of color, the artist may seek to challenge and raise awareness about racial injustice, aiming for social change and greater equality.
Learn more about racial oppression:
https://brainly.com/question/26131682
#SPJ4
Archaeological studies reveal that haircutting and hairstyling were practiced in some form as early as the _____.
A. Ice Age
B. Golden Age of Greece
C. Renaissance
D. Victorian Age
Archaeological studies reveal that haircutting and hairstyling were practiced in some form as early as the Ice Age. Thus the correct option is A.
The word "Ice Age" refers to a geological age marked by persistently cold Earthly temperatures, when glaciers and a great deal of the planet's surface were covered in ice.
Evidence from archaeological studies shows that haircutting and hairstyling practices have been around since the Ice Age. This proof is presented in the form of artifacts, such as objects that were probably used for grooming and hairstyling.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about Ice Age, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31312557
#SPJ1
based on the excerpt, calhoun would also be most likely to support which of the following? responses proslavery arguments proslavery arguments policies favoring immigration policies favoring immigration expanded united states federal authority expanded united states federal authority united states sale of disputed territory
John C. Calhoun was a prominent political figure in the United States during the mid-19th century, and he was known for his staunch support of states' rights and slavery. He believed that the federal government should have limited power and that individual states should be able to make their own decisions about important issues like slavery.
In order to properly answer this question, it's important to have access to the excerpt being referenced. Without that context, it's difficult to definitively say which option Calhoun would be most likely to support. However, given some background information on Calhoun, it's possible to make an educated guess.
Based on this information, it's reasonable to assume that Calhoun would be most likely to support proslavery arguments and expanded United States federal authority, as those align with his beliefs about states' rights and the role of the federal government. Policies favoring immigration and the United States sale of disputed territory would likely be less important to him in comparison.
To know more about John C. Calhoun visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2997536
#SPJ11
refer to scenario 17-2. if each firm is permitted to drill two wells at most, the firms are in a nash equilibrium when a. bq drills two wells and exxoff drills one well. b. bq drills one well and exxoff drills two wells. c. both firms drill two wells. d. both firms drill one well.
In scenario 17-2, if each firm is permitted to drill two wells at most, the firms are in a Nash equilibrium when both firms drill one well (option d).
This is because if one firm drills two wells and the other drills one, the firm with two wells will have an advantage in the market and can potentially earn more profits. However, if both firms drill two wells, this will result in excess supply, leading to lower prices and lower profits for both firms. Therefore, both firms drilling one well is the best option for both parties as it allows them to maximize their profits without creating excess supply in the market. In conclusion, option d is the Nash equilibrium when each firm is permitted to drill two wells at most and is the most beneficial outcome for both firms.
To know more about Nash equilibrium visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28903257
#SPJ11
What is your vision of the Learner Government in 3 years' time?
according to the selection, what describes the transformation that has recently taken place in chattanooga?
Answer:
The selection describes Chattanooga's transformation as a shift from an industrial to a technology-centered economy, with a growing focus on innovative technology to fuel its growth.
Explanation:
The transformation that has recently taken place in Chattanooga is one that has been impressive and innovative.
The city has reinvented itself from a declining industrial hub into a thriving technology-driven community. The selection describes how Chattanooga has successfully built a fiber optic network that provides some of the fastest internet speeds in the world. This has enabled startups and established businesses alike to set up shop in the city, creating new jobs and opportunities for residents. Furthermore, Chattanooga has focused on sustainability and green energy, making it a leader in the renewable energy sector. The city's transformation has been a result of strong partnerships between the private sector, government, and community leaders. Chattanooga has also invested heavily in its public spaces, creating walkable neighborhoods, bike lanes, and parks. Overall, the transformation of Chattanooga is an inspiring story of a city that has embraced innovation, sustainability, and collaboration to create a better future for its residents.
To know more about Chattanooga visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28946181
#SPJ11
NEED ASAP
What lesson were Asian American protestors taught by the African American civil rights leaders?
Asian American protestors have been taught valuable lessons by African American civil rights leaders, including the importance of unity, resilience, and the power of grassroots organizing in the pursuit of social justice and equality.
Asian American protestors have learned significant lessons from African American civil rights leaders. They have witnessed the power of unity and solidarity in the face of systemic discrimination and inequality. African American leaders have shown them the importance of resilience and perseverance in the ongoing struggle for justice. They have shared strategies and tactics of grassroots organizing, emphasizing the strength that comes from mobilizing communities and advocating for change collectively. By studying the history of African American civil rights movements, Asian American protestors have gained insights into effective ways to challenge oppression, raise awareness, and fight for equal rights and representation. These lessons have helped shape their activism and fostered inter-community alliances, creating a broader coalition striving for social progress and racial justice.Therefore, it can be said that Asian American protestors have been taught valuable lessons by African American civil rights leaders, including the importance of unity, resilience, and the power of grassroots organizing in the pursuit of social justice and equality.
For more such questions on Asian American protestors:
https://brainly.com/question/3567433
#SPJ8
The Suez Canal was built on the isthmus of suez and connected the Sea and the. Sea
Answer:
Mediterranean and Red sea
Explanation:
Answer:
The Suez Canal was built on the Isthmus of Suez and connected the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea.
Explanation:
EDMENTUM EXACTtrue or false: the civil rights act of 1968 encouraged de facto discrimination against african americans in the united states.
Answer: i belive your answer is true
Explanation: i did my research
False. The Civil Rights Act of 1968, also known as the Fair Housing Act, was passed in response to the growing housing discrimination against African Americans.
The act prohibited discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of housing based on race, religion, national origin, and gender. The act was designed to combat the de facto segregation that existed in many cities across the United States and to provide African Americans with equal access to housing opportunities. Therefore, it is incorrect to say that the Civil Rights Act of 1968 encouraged de facto discrimination against African Americans in the United States. In fact, it was an important step forward in the fight for equal rights and opportunities for all Americans, regardless of their race or ethnicity.
To know more about Civil Rights Act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31130140
#SPJ11
FILL THE BLANK. the roving mongol armies of ___ violently subjugated huge parts of asia and europe during the middle ages.
The roving Mongol armies of Genghis Khan violently subjugated huge parts of Asia and Europe during the Middle Ages. Genghis Khan, the founder and leader of the Mongol Empire, led his armies on a series of conquests from the early 13th century onwards.
With their superior military tactics, discipline, and mobility, the Mongols swiftly conquered vast territories, including China, Central Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe. The Mongol invasions were marked by their brutality and effective use of cavalry warfare. Cities and civilizations were decimated, and the Mongols established the largest contiguous empire in history.
Genghis Khan's successors, such as his grandson Kublai Khan, continued expanding Mongol dominion, leaving a lasting impact on the regions they conquered.
To learn more about Genghis Khan, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1845312
#SPJ11
which of the following is not associated with sixteenth-century calvinism
Answer:
The following is not associated with sixteenth-century Calvinism: belief in the doctrine of transubstantiation.
Explanation:
The doctrine of transubstantiation is not associated with sixteenth-century Calvinism. Calvinism rejected the Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation, which holds that the bread and wine of the Eucharist become the actual body and blood of Christ. Instead, Calvinism emphasized the spiritual presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
learn more about clavinism mark on brainly
https://brainly.com/question/15158583
Indulgences are not associated with sixteenth-century calvinism (C)
Calvinism, a branch of Protestantism founded by John Calvin in the 16th century, emphasized the doctrines of predestination, iconoclasm (the rejection of religious images), and the concept of a theocratic form of government. However, indulgences, which were a key issue in the Protestant Reformation, are not associated with Calvinism.
Indulgences were the sale of forgiveness or reduction of punishment for sins, which was strongly criticized by reformers like Martin Luther and had a significant impact on the separation from the Roman Catholic Church. In contrast, Calvinism focused more on the sovereignty of God and the notion of predestination.
Learn more about calvinism
https://brainly.com/question/20397370
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
which of the following is not associated with sixteenth-century calvinism? create 4 options for the question.
a) Predestination
b) Iconoclasm
c) Indulgences
d) Theocracy
when did the first homo sapiens who lived in the new world (the americas) arrive? a)around 15,000 ybp b)prior to 40,000 ybp c)after 10,000 ybp d)during the middle holocene
The first Homo sapiens who lived in the New World (the Americas) arrived around 15,000 years before present (ybp).
The arrival of Homo sapiens in the Americas is a subject of ongoing research and debate among archaeologists and anthropologists. Based on current evidence, it is generally accepted that the earliest human presence in the Americas dates back to approximately 15,000 ybp. This is supported by archaeological sites such as Monte Verde in Chile and Meadowcroft Rockshelter in Pennsylvania, which have provided evidence of human occupation during this time period.
However, it is important to note that further discoveries and research may lead to revisions in our understanding of this timeline in the future.
To know more about Homo sapiens visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30673067
#SPJ11
according to luther, should secular government force people to be christians or to believe certain things?
Answer:
Luther taught that all Christians must be subject to two distinct, though ideally complementary governments, the spiritual and the secular.
According to Martin Luther, secular government should not force people to be Christians or believe certain things.
Luther believed in the separation of church and state, and that the role of government was to maintain order and protect its citizens. In his famous treatise "On Temporal Authority," Luther argued that the state should not interfere in matters of faith and that the church should not meddle in political affairs. He believed that faith was a matter of the heart and could not be compelled by external forces, including the state. Luther's ideas about religious freedom were groundbreaking at the time, and have had a lasting impact on modern society. Today, the idea of separation of church and state is enshrined in many countries' laws and constitutions, and is seen as a fundamental human right.
To know more about Martin Luther visit:
https://brainly.com/question/878248
#SPJ11