Answer: True!
Explanation: Failure to report abuse you know is happening is crime.
The Supreme Court's power has increased over time as the nation has turned
to the Court to decide questions of federal and constitutional law. Do you think the
Court's importance will continue to increase or will it decrease? Explain.
Answer:
decrease because tax prices are going up
Explanation:
my business is unstable how do i help stable it?
Answer: Money makes money. Invest your money more appropriately and find trust worthy employees to benefit your business.
Explanation:
Trump for pence 2020
What benefits or disadvantages might it have for the field?
The benefits of the field research method are that this method helps in collecting valuable and accurate information to solve a research problem, by allowing the researcher to experience the reality of the central theme of the study.
The related disadvantages are the high cost of accessing and collecting data, in addition to the longer time to complete an analysis.
What is field research?It is a type of research based on the researcher's direct observation of the sample population, collecting data through direct search while the facts are happening, to gather the observed facts and conclude them after an in-depth analysis.
Therefore, field research can be positive, as it allows the researcher to observe the facts as they are, without the presence of biases that could be present in the application of an interview or questionnaire, for example.
Learn more about field research here: https://brainly.com/question/5633913
#SPJ1
How old do you have to be to get married
Answer:
17-19 and older
Explanation:
(Please Help)!!
Why does perception of crime matter?
Answer:
Abstract. Public perceptions of crime are valuable to policy makers because how the public perceives issues such as the seriousness of crime, fear of crime, the severity of penalties, and specific crime issues can shape the actions of legislators, who strive to respond to their constituents' concerns.Jul 5, 2022
...............................
Answer:
so true so true coud not agree more
Answer:
Are you speaking another language. Sorry I just know Spanish and English. I can't help you.
Explanation:
Develop an argument that explains if the framers of the U.S. Constitution would approve of the current balance of power between of the national government relative to that of the states.
In your essay, you must:
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information
o At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
U.S. Constitution
Brutus 1
United States v. Lopez
Marbury v. Madison
o Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document from the list or from your study of the structure of American government.
• Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/thesis.
• Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal
Answer:
Develop an argument that explains if the framers of the U.S. Constitution would approve of the current balance of power between of the national government relative to that of the states.
In your essay, you must:
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information
o At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
U.S. Constitution
Brutus 1
United States v. Lopez
Marbury v. Madison
o Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document from the list or from your study of the structure of American government.
• Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/thesis.
• Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal
Explanation:
the connection or relationship between civility and individualism
Answer: Individualism is a philosophy that views people first and foremost as unique individuals rather than as members of a group. It emphasizes the importance of independence, individuality, and autonomy. Foundation for Economic Education. Civility appeared over time from the word civis, which means citizen, that is, only men with property. It matured into civitas, meaning the rights and duties of citizenship, and then civilitas appeared, meaning the art and science of citizenship.
Explanation:
4. Describe how federal judges and justices are chosen and describe the terms they serve. (p. 9) Appointments are made by the President, confirmed by the Senate. Lifetime term
Answer:
The president nominates a candidate for a judgeship or justice position at the federal level, and the nominee must be confirmed by a majority vote in the United States Senate, as part of the Senate's "advice and consent" role. All judges and justices in the national courts are appointed for life.
Explanation:
Nearly every police department in the country has a policy that limits its officers discretion to engage in high speed automobile pursuits of fleeing suspect. Why do you think such policies are so popular among police administrators?
No exceptions should be allowed for the police driver to go over the posted speed limit or ignore traffic signs.
Why are speed limits good?The main goal of speed restrictions is to increase safety by lowering the hazards brought on by drivers' speed decisions. The goal is to lessen speed differences and the likelihood of vehicle collisions.
Police officers will be required to travel at speeds much over the posted limits while doing this task, so it is important to remind them that the maximum speed limit during an intercept is 140 km/h. Police officers on call are permitted to travel as fast as they see fit as long as they are being safe.
Learn more about speed limits here:
https://brainly.com/question/10492698
#SPJ1
During a criminal trial process, whom does the jury inform after arriving at a verdict?
In a criminal trial process, the jury informs the
after arriving at a verdict.
Answer:
They inform the Defendant of the verdict.
In a short Summary, What are the Articles of Confederation?
Answer: The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was the first written constitution of the United States. Written in 1777 and stemming from wartime urgency, its progress was slowed by fears of central authority and extensive land claims by states. It was not ratified until March 1, 1781
Explanation: hope this helps
It takes
of alcohol to impair the eyes' ability to track.
A. a significant amount
B. a small amount
C. a moderate amount
Well, according to the internet, it takes only 4 drinks to become visionary impaired, so small amount ig
4. Explain the change that each of the following amendments made to the Constitution. (p. 13) . Fourteenth Amendment:
Nineteenth Amendment:
Twenty-Sixth Amendment:
No State shall make or execute any law limiting the privileges or immunities of United States citizens; amendments nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor shall any State change refuse equal protection of the laws to any person within its jurisdiction.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or limited on the basis of gender by the United States amendments or any State. Congress shall have the authority to enact appropriate legislation to implement this change article. The right to vote of citizens of the United States who are eighteen years of age.
To learn more about amendments, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ1
Victims and survivors of sexual assault are demanding justice and greater accountability for perpetrators of sexual assault, as exemplified by the #MeToo movement. Critics of #MeToo and this trend say that it has gone too far and ignores due process for the accused. How can victims of sexual assault receive adequate justice while satisfying a sense that such justice has been determined fairly?
Considering sexual harassment and sexual assault affect people on a daily basis, the "Me Too" movement, which focuses on the experiences of sexual violence survivors, has received a lot of support.
What is the "Me Too" movement?
The #MeToo hashtag is frequently used on social media to identify the Me Too movement, an initiative to bring about societal change. It was first established in 2006, but it only gained widespread attention in late 2017 after several well-known actresses spoke out about their encounters with sexual harassment in the movie business.Since then, the movement has served as a platform for women of various backgrounds who have been the victims of sexual harassment, which is most frequently, though not always, committed by a male coworker.Burke claims that by demonstrating the prevalence of sexual harassment and reassuring survivors that they aren't alone and are supported, the Me Too movement promotes empowerment through empathy.To know more about Victims of sexual assault visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10386606
#SPJ1
JROTC is not about joining the military. What is JROTC about?
The Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (JROTC) program prepares high school students for leadership roles while making them aware of their rights, responsibilities and privileges as American citizens. It instructs American youth in lessons of personal development, civic duty, leadership, and service.
Answer:
JROTC is mostly about self-discipline, it helps you understand and verify what's going on around you more clearly. JROTC helps you stay focused and helps you do more than what you would typically do like community service, or coming out to help cheer on your other cadets. JROTC members wants you to stay strong, wants you to keep yourself up tidy
Explanation: i really hope this helps you a lot
5. Dissenting, Justice Stevens argued against the principle of applying all Bill of Rights provisions to the states, “When a federal court insists that state and local authorities follow its dictates on a matter not critical to personal liberty or procedural justice, the latter may be prevented from engaging in the kind of beneficent ‘experimentation in things social and economic’ that ultimately redounds to the benefit of all Americans.” How would you respond?
Justice Stevens, through his argument against the principle of applying all provisions of the Bill of Rights to states, is citing the doctrine of Selective Incorporation.
What is the doctrine of Selective Incorporation?It corresponds to a process that was implemented through the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, where the Supreme Court made it possible for each state to incorporate only some parts of some amendments instead of all.
Therefore, according to the doctrine of Selective Incorporation, the Court would only be able to apply a right to state governments, if such right contributed to maintaining social order, equity and the freedom of individuals. Another reason the court would apply a right to states is if that right is grounded in US tradition and history.
Find out more about Selective Incorporation here:
https://brainly.com/question/16995640
#SPJ1
adrianna downey 35 :)
Answer: nice
Explanation:
Cool! That is neat to know
UvU
What is the principle of stare decisis and why is it important
Answer: Stare decisis means "to stand by things decided" in Latin. When a court faces a legal argument, if a previous court has ruled on the same or a closely related issue, then the court will make its decision in alignment with the last court's decision.
Explanation: it's straightforward to answer.
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
(A) The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
(B) They can show there was an error of law.
(C) The trial used an adversarial system.
(D)There was irrelevant evidence.
Answer: B they can show there was an error of law.
Explanation: After the jury has made their decision they have the opportunity to appeal if they believe there was an error of law shown.
An appeal court can make one of three decisions, what are the three decisions
Answer:By upholding the original decision , Reversing that decision, Remanding the case
Explanation:
Why did the Roman people demand a new legal code?
(1 point)
O They were concerned that Roman Law did not extend to technological issues.
O They wanted to become a republic and needed new laws in place to do so.
O They were worried that older Roman Law hadn't yet been translated into Latin.
O They felt that their interests were secondary to those of priests and patricians.
Who would most likely apply for a copyright? Who would most likely apply for a
patent?
entrepreneurs lol because of their products they dont want ideas to get stolen
What theory of government argues that power is held by a small group of people?
elitist theory
Marxist theory
democratic theory
pluralist theory
Answer: elite theory is the correct answer
Explanation:
Which restrictions are you not ok with? Why or why not
The restrictions that one is not okay with is the movement restriction. The movement restriction came into being as a result of the discovery of the pandemic, COVID-19.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a communicable respiratory disease caused by a new strain of coronavirus that causes illness in humans.
The movement restriction is an infringement to one's right to movement. The right to movement is a concept likened to the freedom of movement and this is entrenched in the fundamental human rights (F.H.R.)
What is fundamental human rights (F.H.R.)?Human rights involves the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and the like. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination as it is found in all constitutions of the world.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about fundamental human rights: https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
Describe the ruling in the 2010 case citizens united v federal election commission, what precedent did it overturn
The court decided by a vote of 5-4 that the free speech provision of the First Amendment makes it illegal for the government to limit the ability of companies, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other groups, to make independent expenditures for political campaigns.
This is further explained below.
What is First Amendment?Generally, According to the First Amendment, Congress is prohibited from passing any laws that "respect" an established religion or "prohibit" the free practice of religion.
Freedom of expression, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances are all safeguarded by this provision. The right of people to keep and bear weapons is guaranteed under the Second Amendment.
In conclusion, The court reached its decision by a vote count of 5 to 4, and found that the free speech section of the First Amendment bars the government from banning independent expenditures for political campaigns by companies, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other groups.
Read more about First Amendment
https://brainly.com/question/1078243
#SPJ1
Name an example of an executive agreement
14. Philia runs a private school that is affiliated with the Catholic Church. She applies to a government program that provides loans to educational institutions in order to build a teaching library that emphasizes
Catholic teaching A public school that was denied a similar loan because the funds ran out sues Philia's school, arguing that using the loan for religious purposes violates the separation of church and state an
deprives public schools of needed resources to instead teach religion. What case would be important for both parties to review in this suit?
O
Fischer v. Saint Mary
New Jersey v. TLO
Brown v. Board of Education
Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Pauley
The case that would be important for both parties in the suit about the violation of the separation of church and state is Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Pauley.
What happened in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Pauley?Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Pauley was a landmark case in the United States Supreme Court that dealt with the state of Missouri refusing to give a religious school a grant that it gave to other non-religious schools.
The Supreme Court ruled that this action by the state of Missouri was a violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution which allowed for the freedom to exercise one's religion.
Philia's school that is affiliated with the Catholic Church therefore has the right to apply for the funding that it received and in the suit by the public school against them, both parties need to check this case of Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Pauley to make their next move.
Find out more on Catholic Schools at https://brainly.com/question/9705632
#SPJ1
Explain why have justice that represent the population of the country is important in selecting nominees
The reason why it is having a justice that represents the population of a country is important in selecting nominees is to ensure that current social conditions are taken into account when making laws.
Why should justices represent the population?The Supreme Court gets to rule on the constitutionality of the various laws that are passed across the country. Their justices should therefore be able to take into account, the views of the population when they make rulings on laws.
The only way to ensure that this happens is that a justice that represents the population of a country is selected as a nominee for the Supreme court.
Find out more on nominating justices at https://brainly.com/question/1193666
#SPJ1
What is an ATM used for?
Answer:
An ATM, which stands for automated teller machine, is a specialized computer that makes it convenient to manage a bank account holder's funds. It allows a person to check account balances, withdraw or deposit money, print a statement of account activities or transactions, and even purchase stamps.
hope it helps.......